“…It is also observed that the sample (1:1)s 100 °C has a longer charge and discharge time, taking a total of 660 s for a current of 1 A/g, while the sample (1:1)s 150 °C takes around 270 s, and the sample (1:1)s 200 °C takes around 250 s. Using the equation to determine the specific capacitance, namely Equation (2), we have that, for the current densities of 1 A/g, 2 A/g, 3 A/g, 4 A/g, and 5 A/g, the specific capacitances for the sample (1:1)s 100 °C are 606.63 F/g, 487.02 F/g, 303.70 F/g, 348.97 F/g, and 277.84 F/g, respectively; for the sample (1:1)s 150 °C, the values are 307.33 F/g, 239.80 F/g, 155.21 F/g, 79.74 F/g, and 20.69 F/g, respectively; and for the sample (1:1)s 200 °C, the specific capacitances are 287.42 F/g, 127.74 F/g, 40.33 F/g, 32.80 F/g, and 33.92 F/g, respectively. In this way, the best performance is obtained for the sample (1:1) at 100 °C and, despite having a lower specific capacitance according to the cyclic voltammetry curves, it is through the charge–discharge curves that there is a more representative value by becoming independent of the amount of active material used to make the working electrode [ 33 , 34 ]. It is observed that the difference in voltage given between the charge and discharge is 0.50 V for the samples (1:1)s 100 °C and (1:1)s 150 °C, while for the sample (1:1)s 200°C, the sample showed a difference of 0.52 V. Thus, the resistance R ESR can be determined, and for the samples (1:1)s 100 °C and (1:1)s 150 °C, a resistance ESR = 0.25 [Ω] is obtained, while for sample (1:1)s 200 °C, a resistance of ESR = 0.26 [Ω] is obtained, which is in accordance with what is observed in Table 1 , given that the samples (1:1) synthesized at 100 and 150 °C have a lower internal resistance compared to the samples synthesized at 200 °C.…”