2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.134761
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of inhibitor adsorption on readings of microelectrode during SVET measurements

Abstract: One of the main applications of SVET in corrosion research is the study of the corrosion inhibition effectiveness and the evaluation of the self-healing effect of inhibitor-containing coatings. The tip of the platinum/iridium vibrating electrode is electroplated with black platinum, which creates a large electrode surface and confers high capacitance to the tip. When studying organic inhibitors in aqueous solutions with SVET, inhibitor adsorption may occur at the tip, causing its contamination and the initial … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been already recognized that the anodic and cathodic reactions arising at the metal/solution interface cause the cathodic and anodic ionic currents that create the variation on potential over the metallic surface. [ 41 ] Using SVET, these variations in the potential are examined and transformed into the local current densities using scanning vibrative electrodes. The SVET mapping images revealed the regions with differences in current density, thus displaying the progress of localized corrosion on the SS alloys over the exposure period.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been already recognized that the anodic and cathodic reactions arising at the metal/solution interface cause the cathodic and anodic ionic currents that create the variation on potential over the metallic surface. [ 41 ] Using SVET, these variations in the potential are examined and transformed into the local current densities using scanning vibrative electrodes. The SVET mapping images revealed the regions with differences in current density, thus displaying the progress of localized corrosion on the SS alloys over the exposure period.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 3D mappings of ionic fluxes in a square array of 21 × 21 points were collected above the exposed area (2 × 2 mm 2 ) containing the scratches. The scratched DCPD coated samples were monitored during the immersion for 4 h. The current density was calculated as Equation (1) [ 31 ]. Where i is current density, k is the solution conductivity ( k was measured using SX650 conductivity meter; 17.5 ± 0.2 ms cm −1 in Hank's solution; 16.5 ± 0.2 ms cm −1 in NS solution), Δ V is the measured reaction potential difference in amplitude of (set as 30 μm in the experiment).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potential was detected on an area of 16 000 μm × 4000 μm with a scanning rate of 500 μm/s. The current density was calculated using Equation (1) [12] :…”
Section: Svet Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%