2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.12.119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of instrument conditions on the evaporation behavior of uranium dioxide with UV laser-assisted atom probe tomography

Abstract: 2016-11-02T18:49:00

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Laser energies greater than 10 pJ did not affect the O/U ratio, maintaining an O/U near 2.00. The optimization of run parameters for UO 2 in UV-APT are discussed in detail elsewhere [23]. For CeO 2 , the following atom probe run parameters were investigated: 20-50 K, 100-250 kHz, 2.5-120 pJ, and detection rate 0.01-0.03 atoms/pulse.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Laser energies greater than 10 pJ did not affect the O/U ratio, maintaining an O/U near 2.00. The optimization of run parameters for UO 2 in UV-APT are discussed in detail elsewhere [23]. For CeO 2 , the following atom probe run parameters were investigated: 20-50 K, 100-250 kHz, 2.5-120 pJ, and detection rate 0.01-0.03 atoms/pulse.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At laser energies below 5 pJ, correct stoichiometry will be measured in CeO 2 [22]. However for UO 2 , the laser energy is not sufficient to achieve laser-assisted evaporation since at 5 pJ, the evaporation of ions is primarily controlled by the DC electric field, which produces an oxygen deficient composition measurement [23]. For these reasons, a moderate laser energy of 120 pJ was selected for this comparative study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations