“…The resistivity of (Pb 2 MnSe 3 ) 0.6 VSe 2 decreases as the temperature is decreased from room temperature, as expected for a metal, before increasing slowly as the temperature is decreased below ∼150 K. The rate of increasing resistivity accelerates below ∼100 K. The upturn in resistivity at ∼100 K is similar to that found in (PbSe) 1.1 VSe 2 , although the magnitude of the increase is less and the transition is also less abrupt. , The origin of the charge density wave (CDW) in (PbSe) 1.1 VSe 2 is from the VSe 2 monolayer. The signature upturn in resistivity remains if the thickness of the PbSe layer is increased or if PbSe is replaced by SnSe to form the compounds [(SnSe) 1.1 ] m VSe 2 . , The temperature where the upturn occurs varies systematically with the thickness of the SnSe or PbSe layer. , The sharpness of the upturn also varies, presumably as a result of changes in carrier concentration due to defects that form during self-assembly of the precursor. , The CDW found in the compounds with monolayers of VSe 2 is not present if the thickness of the VSe 2 is increased. , The CDW is changed if modulation doping occurs and is completely suppressed for large amounts of charge transfer, for example, in (BiSe)VSe 2 . CDW transitions in monolayers of VSe 2 have also been reported, and were shown to be sensitive to the heterointerface formed with the substrate. , The rotational disorders present in both (PbSe) 1.1 VSe 2 and (Pb 2 MnSe 3 ) 0.6 VSe 2 prevent direct measurement of structural distortion caused by the localization of conduction electrons .…”