1998
DOI: 10.1016/s1383-5866(98)00070-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of ion size and charge in nanofiltration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
231
0
5

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 502 publications
(254 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
18
231
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The retention sequence of the salt solutions was R(Na 2 SO 4 )4R(NaCl)4R(MgSO 4 )4R(MgCl 2 ), which could be explained by the Donnan exclusion theory, which determines the retention performance of charged NF membranes. 78 Based on this theory, the Donnan potential at the interphase of the solution and membrane excludes co-ions from the membrane. To maintain electroneutrality of the solution on each side of the membrane, counter ions must also be excluded.…”
Section: Multilayer Graphene Desalination Membranesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The retention sequence of the salt solutions was R(Na 2 SO 4 )4R(NaCl)4R(MgSO 4 )4R(MgCl 2 ), which could be explained by the Donnan exclusion theory, which determines the retention performance of charged NF membranes. 78 Based on this theory, the Donnan potential at the interphase of the solution and membrane excludes co-ions from the membrane. To maintain electroneutrality of the solution on each side of the membrane, counter ions must also be excluded.…”
Section: Multilayer Graphene Desalination Membranesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This information is very important for many industrial applications, especially for those involving separation of mono/ divalent salts from small molecular weight organics. Table 4 shows the effect of glutaraldehyde MgSO 4 compared to those of NaCl, we calculated the theoretical rejections of Na + ,M g 2 + ,C l − and SO 4 2 − ions using their hydrated ionic radii [16] and Ferry's modified equation [12] for a pore of 1-nm radius. The corresponding calculated rejections were 49, 59, 41 and 50%.…”
Section: Permeation Of Model Solutesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3. Similar to the case of methyl-, the charge of carboxyl-terminated ligands is negative as demonstrated by a rejection in the order of R(MgCl 2 )oR(NaCl)oR(Na 2 SO 4 ) 30 . While in the case of methyl, charge is due to OH À adsorption, carboxyl is inherently negative under identical electrolyte conditions due to deprotonation and |X| can be as much as two to three times larger for a given set of ions (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%