2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Ions, Hydration, and the Transcriptional Inhibitor P4N on the Conformations of the Sp1 Binding Site

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The resulting binding fractions from two-component FCS analysis at each Sp1 concentration were plotted in Figure 3, which yields an affinity K d of 32 ± 2 nM from a hyperbolic fit. This result is in good agreement with the affinity estimated from EMSA (51). …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The resulting binding fractions from two-component FCS analysis at each Sp1 concentration were plotted in Figure 3, which yields an affinity K d of 32 ± 2 nM from a hyperbolic fit. This result is in good agreement with the affinity estimated from EMSA (51). …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Our next approach was based on selective interference of Sp1- mediated transactivation of genes with TMP, a lignan tetra- O -methyl nordihydroguaiaretic acid derivative, which has been shown to specifically bind to Sp1-specific DNA binding domains within the responsive gene promoter regions and interfere with the transcription of these Sp1-controlled genes (33-36). We have confirmed decreased DNA binding activity of Sp1 by TMP as assessed by ELISA-based Sp1 binding assay (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Borges and Collins 112 described that buffers, such as tricine (pH 8.0, 20 mmol l À1 ), affect the high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) stability and performance of study have themselves high complexing capabilities and buffer interference is thought to be simply nonexistent. These studies involve proteins with heme groups, [134][135][136] Zn-nger motifs, [137][138][139] metalloproteins 116,133,[140][141][142] and/or other complexing agents in solution. 81,[143][144][145] In fact, the concentrations of the compounds used, and most importantly the ratio of the buffer concentration to the complexing compound concentration in the medium, are within values that support the idea that no interference of the buffer occurs.…”
Section: Hepesmentioning
confidence: 99%