2020
DOI: 10.3390/nu12092512
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Iron on the Gut Microbiota in Colorectal Cancer

Abstract: Perturbations of the colonic microbiota can contribute to the initiation and progression of colorectal cancer, leading to an increase in pathogenic bacteria at the expense of protective bacteria. This can contribute to disease through increasing carcinogenic metabolite/toxin production, inducing inflammation, and activating oncogenic signaling. To limit disease progression, external factors that may influence the colonic microbiota need to be considered in patients with colorectal cancer. One major factor that… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 146 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, this leaves the potential for the study of the gut microbiota in pathological conditions to be confounded by discrepancies in therapeutic interventions. 11,12 For instance, patients with right-sided colorectal cancer tend to more commonly develop iron de ciency anaemia, compared to those with left-sided colorectal cancer. Enteral iron is often given to treat anaemia, which has the potential to increase colonic iron concentration and alter the gut microbiota.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, this leaves the potential for the study of the gut microbiota in pathological conditions to be confounded by discrepancies in therapeutic interventions. 11,12 For instance, patients with right-sided colorectal cancer tend to more commonly develop iron de ciency anaemia, compared to those with left-sided colorectal cancer. Enteral iron is often given to treat anaemia, which has the potential to increase colonic iron concentration and alter the gut microbiota.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, this suggests the use of parental iron supplementation in anaemic colorectal cancer patients in order to study the gut microbiota. 11,12 This pilot study aims to determine the gut bacterial pro les of the on-and off-tumour microbiota in colorectal cancer and how they differ between patients with right-and left-sided colorectal cancer. In order to address the issue regarding iron supplementation, all patients were treated with parental iron prior to surgery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary; it has been found to be ineffective in individuals with cancer and especially CRC, since intestinal iron absorption is greatly reduced in these patients (nearly 95% of the iron being excreted) ( 33 ). Furthermore, the increased availability of iron in the gut due to reduced intestinal iron absorption may support the proliferation of pathogenic gut bacteria conducive to tumor progression in preference to protective passenger bacteria that are more likely to hinder disease progression ( 148 ). As for the very small quantity of iron absorbed, most remains trapped within the enterocytes, where it is largely blocked by inflammatory cytokines and thus cannot be metabolized ( 33 , 149 ).…”
Section: On a Therapeutic Knife-edge: Iron Replacement Therapy In Patmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Iron is essential for the growth and development of the vast majority of gut bacteria, with pathogenic bacteria tending to have heightened iron acquisition mechanisms [ 6 ]. Hence, in anemic colorectal cancer patients, the use of oral iron supplementation has the potential to alter bacterial populations of the colorectal tumor-associated (on-tumor) microbiota, as well as the non-tumor-associated mucosal (off-tumor) microbiota, through increasing gut luminal iron concentration [ 7 , 8 ]. This may suggest that a parenteral route of iron administration may be more beneficial to treat anemia, without increasing iron availability to colonic bacteria.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%