2020
DOI: 10.3390/en13154003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Loading Rate on the Energy Evolution Characteristics of Rocks under Cyclic Loading and Unloading

Abstract: To analyse the effect of loading rate on the energy evolution of rocks under cyclic loading and unloading, tests on saturated limestone were conducted at loading rates of 0.15, 0.2, and 0.3 mm/min, and the evolution characteristics of plastic, elastic, dissipation, and input energies were examined under different loading rates. The results indicated that the plastic strain in the entire test was directly proportional to the loading rate. In addition, strength, residual stress, plastic energy, and dissipation e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The elastic strain energy is stored in the rock during loading, which is gradually released during unloading and is the major energy cause of rock deformation and failure. Then, the energy is dissipated due to plastic strain and microdamage of the rock, which is irrecoverable with the unloading of the stress [31]. When the elastic strain energy reaches the rock energy storage limit, the rock enters the failure stage.…”
Section: Establishment Of the Brittleness Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The elastic strain energy is stored in the rock during loading, which is gradually released during unloading and is the major energy cause of rock deformation and failure. Then, the energy is dissipated due to plastic strain and microdamage of the rock, which is irrecoverable with the unloading of the stress [31]. When the elastic strain energy reaches the rock energy storage limit, the rock enters the failure stage.…”
Section: Establishment Of the Brittleness Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e average porosity of the rock samples measured via nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) was 0.53%. Tables 1 and 2 are reproduced from the work of Li et al [10] (under the Creative Commons Attribution License/ public domain).…”
Section: Rock Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the pre-peak failure stage, the dissipated energy density of the rock gradually increased. When the load reached peak stress, the dissipated energy significantly extended, the elastic energy stored in the specimen was gradually released in the form of kinetic energy and fracture energy, and the specimen began to deform and eventually destroyed (Li et al 2020;Xiao et al 2019; energy density (U d ) is illustrated in Fig. 8(b).…”
Section: Energy Composition Of the Rockmentioning
confidence: 99%