2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2018.03.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Mach number and angle of attack on the two-dimensional transonic buffet phenomenon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
22
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
6
22
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Secondly, the unsteadiness captured in Fig. 5a is not harmonic as previously seen for the RBC12 aircraft [19] or in 2D studies for the OAT15A aerofoil [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. Although not shown here, the drag coefficient, C D , and pitching moment coefficient, C M , exhibit similar patterns.…”
Section: Global Forces and Surface Samplingsupporting
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Secondly, the unsteadiness captured in Fig. 5a is not harmonic as previously seen for the RBC12 aircraft [19] or in 2D studies for the OAT15A aerofoil [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. Although not shown here, the drag coefficient, C D , and pitching moment coefficient, C M , exhibit similar patterns.…”
Section: Global Forces and Surface Samplingsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…al. [15] found that RSM closures are more robust than typically used Spalart-Allmaras (SA) and Shear Stress Transport (SST) turbulence models for 2D shock-buffet prediction. Steady-state simulations by Apetrei et.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A DMD mode at St = 0.44 mainly describes the shock motion, whereas DMD modes at higher frequencies again comprise shock motion as well as acoustic waves. The existence of a bifurcation in the shock dynamics was already suggested by Giannelis et al [44], where at certain flow conditions upstream-propagating pressure waves are periodically generated at the trailing edge at significantly higher frequencies than the co-existing permanent shock wave oscillating at a typical frequency associated with buffet (St ≈ 0.1). In the present case, no permanent shock wave is apparent so that only type C shock motion is observed, similar to experiments by McDevitt at al.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Similar phenomena were reported by Memmolo et al [17] analysing the V2C airfoil at α = 7 • and high Reynolds numbers using large-eddy simulation. In a URANS parameter study exploring the buffet domain varying the angle of attack (3 ≤ α ≤ 9.5) and Mach number (0.55 < M < 0.75), an interesting coexistence between type A and type C shock motion was reported by Giannelis et al [44]. The disturbances associated with the type C shock motion emerged from downstream-convecting recirculation pockets that produced oscillations at the trailing edge at significantly higher frequencies compared to the low-frequency lift oscillation associated with buffet.…”
Section: Dynamic Mode Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 90%