2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2008.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of machine tool setting parameters on EHD lubrication in hypoid gears

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This model, widely used for non-linear, non-Newtonian traction [20,32,34,40] does not include a limiting shear stress, There is also an underlying presumption that viscoelastic behaviour occurs at relatively high slideroll ratios. However, high wear rates have also been noted for even low slide-roll ratios under tractive conditions [41], where one would normally assume Newtonian shear.…”
Section: 1-non-newtonian Lubricant Shear Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This model, widely used for non-linear, non-Newtonian traction [20,32,34,40] does not include a limiting shear stress, There is also an underlying presumption that viscoelastic behaviour occurs at relatively high slideroll ratios. However, high wear rates have also been noted for even low slide-roll ratios under tractive conditions [41], where one would normally assume Newtonian shear.…”
Section: 1-non-newtonian Lubricant Shear Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simon [20] presented a thermo-elastohydrodynamic analysis of hypoid gear pairs. He considered the contact as an elliptical point contact.…”
Section: -Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, a line contact geometry was assumed. Simon 38 presented a thermo-elastohydrodynamic analysis of hypoid gear pairs with elliptical point contact geometry, but with the entrainment flow vector was along the minor axis of the contact ellipse. Furthermore, a low applied input torque, not representative of vehicular differentials, was used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Xu and Kahraman (2007) and Kolivand et al (2010) have investigated mechanical inefficiencies in gearing arising from the EHL of meshing gear pairs, where a line contact approximation is made with flow along the contact width. Simon (2009b) presented a thermo-elastohydrodynamic analysis of hypoid gear pairs with point contact geometry, but at relatively low input torque, not representative of vehicle differentials. Again, the flow vector is assumed along the minor axis of the contact ellipse, this being a shortcoming as experimental evidence, for example by Gohar (1971) and numerical work by and Jalali-Vahid et al (2000) suggest significant side-leakage flow along the major axis of the contact ellipse.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%