2007
DOI: 10.1063/1.2773645
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Magnetic Fields and Biasing on the Plasma of a RF Driven Negative Ion Source

Abstract: Abstract. The development of a RF driven negative-ion source currently in progress at IPP Garching has made remarkable progresses during the last years. Optimization of the source strongly depends on the understanding of the physics of generation, destruction and extraction of negative ions. Numerical model calculations can provide important information needed for the improvement of this understanding. Since negative ions are mainly produced on Cesium covered surfaces of the source, and have a survival length … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
10
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Analytical 1-D studies of the presheath region confirm the decrease of N e , physically due to the fact that region 3 is a sink of electrons [12]. In the present code, we restrict the simulation to regions 3 and 4, making generic assumption on region 2 based on previous studies [11], [12] and on extracted total current. This strategy has the disadvantage of not being a complete simulation of the whole source and has the advantage of not depending on collisional effects (strongly dependent on ion temperature) and ion production mechanism (depending on conditions which are still debated like cesium distribution), which strongly affect the presheath [1], [8], [10] but hardly modify the beam acceleration in the sheath.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Analytical 1-D studies of the presheath region confirm the decrease of N e , physically due to the fact that region 3 is a sink of electrons [12]. In the present code, we restrict the simulation to regions 3 and 4, making generic assumption on region 2 based on previous studies [11], [12] and on extracted total current. This strategy has the disadvantage of not being a complete simulation of the whole source and has the advantage of not depending on collisional effects (strongly dependent on ion temperature) and ion production mechanism (depending on conditions which are still debated like cesium distribution), which strongly affect the presheath [1], [8], [10] but hardly modify the beam acceleration in the sheath.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Electric fields are correspondingly different. The still standing need of separating numerical 2-D studies of the sheath and presheath regions for the different length scales involved is well documented in the recent literature [11]. Thus, we should add another region, i.e., region 3, (corresponding to the sheath) in negative source models, with the identification of presheath to region 2 for simplicity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Computer simulations are useful tools that support that task. A lot of effort has been made in order to model negative ion extraction in both 1D [5], 2D [6] and 3D [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. The results obtained using these codes show e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%