2018
DOI: 10.1080/19427867.2018.1494896
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of major stream composition on critical gap at two-way stop-controlled intersections – a case study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the probabilistic method takes into account the inconsistency and heterogeneity in the gap acceptance behavior of drivers in the minor stream and treats the critical gap as a random variable. There are different methods of calculating the critical gap in the literature, which includes Raff’s method, the clearing time method, the binary probit model, the maximum likelihood method, and so forth, as well as machine learning methods, such as the decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and ANN methods ( 1327 ). For example, Sangole and Patil ( 21 ) applied an adaptive neuro-fuzzy interface system (ANFIS) to model drivers’ gap acceptance behavior at a limited priority T-intersection.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the probabilistic method takes into account the inconsistency and heterogeneity in the gap acceptance behavior of drivers in the minor stream and treats the critical gap as a random variable. There are different methods of calculating the critical gap in the literature, which includes Raff’s method, the clearing time method, the binary probit model, the maximum likelihood method, and so forth, as well as machine learning methods, such as the decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and ANN methods ( 1327 ). For example, Sangole and Patil ( 21 ) applied an adaptive neuro-fuzzy interface system (ANFIS) to model drivers’ gap acceptance behavior at a limited priority T-intersection.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the CTM and OTM are the methods developed in developing countries like India. The CTM is helpful in heterogeneous traffic conditions, and the OTM is useful in both homogeneous and heterogeneous traffic conditions (Mohan and Chandra, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the existing methods, the Raff method is the earliest method for estimating the critical gap and is used in many countries because of its simplicity. Many researchers have emphasized that the Maximum Likelihood Method (MLM) is more consistent, produces unbiased estimates of the mean critical gap, and provides the best results (Kyte et al, 1994;Brilon, Koenig and Troutbeck, 1999;Gavulová, 2012;Troutbeck, 2014Troutbeck, , 2016Sangole, 2015, 2016;Mohan and Chandra, 2016). Most of these methods, excluding the CTM and OTM, were incapable and inefficient in producing actual critical gaps for traffic in developing countries (Chandra, Mohan and Gates, 2014;Amin and Maurya, 2015;Chandra, 2016, 2018a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Analysis of unsignalized intersections is often based on the assumption that major street traffic passes through the intersections unhindered. However, an earlier study found that the priority rules are not observed at intersections in India and even the major street traffic is forced to slow down by the minor street vehicles as they approach an intersection 18 . Hence it would be erroneous to use PCE values obtained at mid-block sections for removing the heterogeneity of the major street through traffic at unsignalized intersections.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%