2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2021.117356
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of martensitic configuration on hysteretic properties of Heusler films studied by advanced imaging in magnetic field and temperature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 31,34 ] In Ni–Mn–Ga, twin boundaries are slightly tilted and rotated away from {110} planes (as described before) and from the six possible orientations in bulk, in these films we only observe the so‐called type X subsets, where the twin boundary is inclined by 45° to the substrate normal and traces follow either [100] Ni–Mn–Ga or [010] Ni–Mn–Ga directions on the film surface. [ 31,35 ] Twin boundaries in (i) are rotated by 45° with respect to those visible in (g) and (h) due to the differences in the substrate architecture mentioned before (Figure 2d–f). Due to the four‐fold symmetry of the cubic substrates, two equivalent orientations of the parallel lines on the film surface are possible, which are also clearly visible for both films grown on Si.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…[ 31,34 ] In Ni–Mn–Ga, twin boundaries are slightly tilted and rotated away from {110} planes (as described before) and from the six possible orientations in bulk, in these films we only observe the so‐called type X subsets, where the twin boundary is inclined by 45° to the substrate normal and traces follow either [100] Ni–Mn–Ga or [010] Ni–Mn–Ga directions on the film surface. [ 31,35 ] Twin boundaries in (i) are rotated by 45° with respect to those visible in (g) and (h) due to the differences in the substrate architecture mentioned before (Figure 2d–f). Due to the four‐fold symmetry of the cubic substrates, two equivalent orientations of the parallel lines on the film surface are possible, which are also clearly visible for both films grown on Si.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The AFM images in Figure 1a demonstrate the presence of X-type twins that are characterized by different orientations of the twinning planes (i.e., at 45 • degrees to the MgO(001) substrate) [42][43][44][45][46][47]. The corresponding out-of-plane contribution of the magnetic domains can be visualized in the MFM images as the dark and the bright contrasts (Figure 1b) [42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49]. When cooling from 400 K, the thermomagnetic curves of the pristine sample (Figure 1c) show an abrupt rise in the susceptibility at around 344 K, which is ascribed to crossing the austenitic Curie temperature of the sample [50], where it transforms from the paramagnetic austenitic phase to ferromagnetic austenitic phase.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coherently, the high-resolution backscattered electron (BSE) image in Figure d shows the dominant presence of Y-type twining configurations and the small regions of X-type twining configurations, some of which are labeled in the figure. X-type and Y-type are characterized by different orientations of the twins (i.e., at 45° and 90° degrees to the MgO(001) substrate, respectively) in the martensitic phase. As a consequence, they are also characterized by different magnetic anisotropy contributions, all in-plane for the Y-type and both in-plane and out-of-plane for the X-type. The blurred regions in Figure d are expected to be due to the material undergoing the martensitic transition at room temperature.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The blurred regions in Figure d are expected to be due to the material undergoing the martensitic transition at room temperature. Comprehensive structural and microstructural characterizations can be found in references. , …”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%