2013
DOI: 10.17973/mmsj.2013_06_201306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Material Removal Way on Thin-Walled Part Quality by Milling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second method is the appropriate machining strategy (material removal method) for thin walls. Effective machining strategies significantly impact the surface quality of thin-wall parts [8,9]. The third method uses an end mill with a variable pitch [5,[10][11][12] and a variable helix angle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second method is the appropriate machining strategy (material removal method) for thin walls. Effective machining strategies significantly impact the surface quality of thin-wall parts [8,9]. The third method uses an end mill with a variable pitch [5,[10][11][12] and a variable helix angle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drilling and milling operations [Baranek 2013] [Peterka 2008] require a precision geometry [Peterka 2018] and cutting tool material [Chaus 2010]. The geometry of the cutting edge sets high demands on the dimensional quality, shape and size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second way is the appropriate machining strategy (material removal way) of the thin-walled parts. An effective machining strategy has a significant impact on the surface quality of the thin-walled parts (7,8). The third way is the use of end mills with variable pitch (9,14,15) and variable helix angle (4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%