2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.06.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of maxillary obturator prostheses on facial morphology in patients with unilateral maxillary defects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
7
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…A method of imaging was used on subjects with unilateral maxillary defects in which the facial data was acquired from them either with or without their maxillary prostheses . Facial landmarks were studied, and the authors were able to show that displacement of some points with the obturator in place, such as the lateral and inferior points at the ala of the nose were greater on the defect side compared with the normal side . The study concluded that the maxillary obturator prosthesis changed the facial morphology around the nose, ala, and lip.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A method of imaging was used on subjects with unilateral maxillary defects in which the facial data was acquired from them either with or without their maxillary prostheses . Facial landmarks were studied, and the authors were able to show that displacement of some points with the obturator in place, such as the lateral and inferior points at the ala of the nose were greater on the defect side compared with the normal side . The study concluded that the maxillary obturator prosthesis changed the facial morphology around the nose, ala, and lip.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…difficulties represented by differences in the visceral skull structures [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Craniometric Characteristic Of the Visceral Skull In Adulthoodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common approach to the rehabilitation of patients with maxillary defects remains the use of a removable prosthetic as a defect obturator, precisely defined by The Glossary of Prosthodontics Terms as “a prosthesis used to close a congenital or an acquired tissue opening, primarily of the hard palate and/or contiguous alveolar structures” [ 17 , 18 ]. Among all the generally accepted advantages resulting from their use, such as reduction in hospitalization time and cost, the possibility of avoiding or deleting a second surgical procedure for defect closure and the immediate reestablishment of facial morphology and oral functions is of paramount,—not least for the possibility of a simplified clinical examination of the surgical defect to detect clinical signs of malignancy recurrence at an early stage [ 19 , 20 , 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%