2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.12.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of mechanical loading on static and dynamic CO2 efflux on differently textured and managed Luvisols

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
2
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results reported by Mordhorst et al [4] indicated that soil compaction directly resulted in the lower CO 2 efflux from compacted soils. In terms of tillage practices, NT and RT led to significant soil CO 2 efflux decrement before 26 days (p<0.05); however, MP did not show the obvious variation trend (Figs 2-3).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Similar results reported by Mordhorst et al [4] indicated that soil compaction directly resulted in the lower CO 2 efflux from compacted soils. In terms of tillage practices, NT and RT led to significant soil CO 2 efflux decrement before 26 days (p<0.05); however, MP did not show the obvious variation trend (Figs 2-3).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Hence, no significant effects on soil CO 2 efflux were observed for large macro-, meso-, and micropores. On the other hand, tillage practices through differences in mechanical disturbances altered physical changes in pore systems, which controled CO 2 efflux by changes in gas transport properties [4]. In other Values followed by the same letter within a column at the same level of bulk density before and after incubation indicate no significant difference at the 0.05 level.…”
Section: Relationship Between Soil Co 2 Efflux and Pore Size Distribumentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As a consequence of the altered water saturation and pore size distribution including pore connectivity we can also find altered CO 2 emissions which can be explained in combination with the biological activity. Two counteracting factors need to be considered (for a schematic overview see Mordhorst et al, 2014): -a reduction of air-filled pores causes a reduction of air conductivity and therefore oxygen supply might be restricted. This results in a reduced biological activity, since oxygen supply is a limiting factor for biological activity.…”
Section: Last Column)mentioning
confidence: 99%