2021
DOI: 10.3390/cells10020481
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Sources on Their Regenerative Capacities on Different Surfaces

Abstract: Current gold-standard strategies for bone regeneration do not achieve the optimal recovery of bone biomechanical properties. To bypass these limitations, tissue engineering techniques based on hybrid materials made up of osteoprogenitor cells—such as mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs)—and bioactive ceramic scaffolds—such as calcium phosphate-based (CaPs) bioceramics—seem promising. The biological properties of MSCs are influenced by the tissue source. This study aims to define the optimal MSC source and construct (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, although DPSCs and PLSCs share similar DNA methylation patterns, slight differences in 5-mC in skeletal-related genes (e.g., SMAD and CD109) confer variations in osteogenesis capacity (Ai et al, 2018). In this regard, DPSCs exhibit higher mineralization capacity than other MSCs, including BMSCs, ATSCs, and different DT-MSCs (Xu et al, 2013;Padial-Molina et al, 2019;Shen et al, 2019;Mucientes et al, 2021). Thus, not surprisingly, the hypomethylation of the WNT10B locus (Figure 1G) facilitates its expression in DPSCs (Fracaro et al, 2020) to favor osteogenesis over adipogenesis, which suggests that DNA methylation is a mechanism underlying adipocyte and bone cell development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, although DPSCs and PLSCs share similar DNA methylation patterns, slight differences in 5-mC in skeletal-related genes (e.g., SMAD and CD109) confer variations in osteogenesis capacity (Ai et al, 2018). In this regard, DPSCs exhibit higher mineralization capacity than other MSCs, including BMSCs, ATSCs, and different DT-MSCs (Xu et al, 2013;Padial-Molina et al, 2019;Shen et al, 2019;Mucientes et al, 2021). Thus, not surprisingly, the hypomethylation of the WNT10B locus (Figure 1G) facilitates its expression in DPSCs (Fracaro et al, 2020) to favor osteogenesis over adipogenesis, which suggests that DNA methylation is a mechanism underlying adipocyte and bone cell development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MSCs markers were identified using flow cytometry, while Alizarin red was utilized for staining culture calcium deposition in tissues, whereas cell proliferation was performed according to the AlamarBlue assay. Finally, cell lysates were used to measure ALP activity after centrifugation, as illustrated in Figure 9 [153,154]. marker to identify osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow MSCs [65].…”
Section: Graphene Oxide In Rat Mesenchymal Stem Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This capacity can be enhanced by supplementing cultures with 17ßestradiol (37). When cultured on different surfaces such as plastic, hydroxyapatite and β-tricalcium phosphate, DPSCs show higher proliferation capacity and greatest osteogenic potential when compared to cells isolated from adipose tissue, and bone marrow (38).…”
Section: Dental Pulp Stem Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%