2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of mesh structure on 2D full shallow water equations and SCS Curve Number simulation of rainfall/runoff events

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
101
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
101
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Designing the mesh of a river network is generally a challenging optimization problem where the number of nodes must be minimized, while process representation and model convergence must be ensured (Mandlburger et al 2009;Caviedes-Voullième et al 2012). One approach is the examination of grid convergence.…”
Section: Refining the Meshmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Designing the mesh of a river network is generally a challenging optimization problem where the number of nodes must be minimized, while process representation and model convergence must be ensured (Mandlburger et al 2009;Caviedes-Voullième et al 2012). One approach is the examination of grid convergence.…”
Section: Refining the Meshmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, it was pointed out that simple empirical lumped models cannot easily describe the complexity of the sediment cycle. Thus, the use of distributed models, capable of taking explicit account of spatial variability of the process, is required (Caviedes-Voullième et al, 2012;Fernández-Pato et al, 2016, Herrero et al, 2017. Once they have been calibrated, even with short data sets, these models have the advantage of reproducing the spatial variability of water and erosional processes in the catchment, and can also be used to run simulations under different intra-basin (changes in land use and water uses) and extra-basin scenarios (climate change).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conceptual simplicity of first order FV schemes and its rather straightforward implementation and ease for parallelization have made it very popular. However, the first order FV approach suffers from high sensitivity to the computational mesh 1 [9], thus requiring high mesh resolution to ensure accuracy. Higher order FV methods have been attempted to solve this issue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, a DG scheme for the shallow water equations must be well-balanced [26,27,28] and positivity-preserving [29], i.e., it must be able (i) to keep steady states over non-constant topography, and (ii) to keep positive values of depth, specially near the wet/dry front. It is also of great importance to have a sufficiently high resolution representation of the topography at very large gradients [9]. This has led to the need of not only properly discretizing the bed source term, but to build meshes that can harbor the required information with precision.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%