2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.12.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of mineral additions and different compositional parameters on the shrinkage of structural expanded clay lightweight concrete

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
13
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…ey highlighted that the saturated aggregates in the concrete mixes could minimize the early-age drying shrinkage and postpone it; nonetheless, higher shrinkage was recorded in long term. Bogas et al [73] compared the behavior of lightweight and conventional concretes under 7day moist curing. It was concluded that the long-term shrinkage could be reduced and delayed by proper curing, by about 16.5% for lightweight and 12% for conventional concretes.…”
Section: Comparison Between Different Curing Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ey highlighted that the saturated aggregates in the concrete mixes could minimize the early-age drying shrinkage and postpone it; nonetheless, higher shrinkage was recorded in long term. Bogas et al [73] compared the behavior of lightweight and conventional concretes under 7day moist curing. It was concluded that the long-term shrinkage could be reduced and delayed by proper curing, by about 16.5% for lightweight and 12% for conventional concretes.…”
Section: Comparison Between Different Curing Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) Another important reason of lower drying shrinkage strain of OPBC concrete was due to significant reduction of water to cement ratio from 0.36 to 0.29 in mix OPBCC. Bogas et al (2014) reported that for the same cement content, the drying shrinkage strain increases with increasing water to cement ratio. In fact, there is an increment of the volume of paste and a corresponding reduction of the aggregate content.…”
Section: Drying Shrinkagementioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, with the different compositional parameters such as types of LWA (fly ash based artificial aggregate, sintering expanded clay, pumice aggregate, or oil palm shell), amount and type of binder, water-to-binder ratio, mineral admixture (silica fume, fly ash), and initial prewetting method for LWA, the shrinkage of LAC may be lower or greater than that of NWC [22][23][24][25][26][27]. Generally, the shrinkage of LACs is reduced by the rigid LWA with higher modulus of elasticity in water saturated condition prewetted and with the greater volume of LWA in the same volume of paste [24][25][26]. And most importantly, in current standard methods, the shrinkage of LAC is usually estimated from the expressions defined for NWC and always gets higher value than those measured in practice [24,28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the shrinkage of LACs is reduced by the rigid LWA with higher modulus of elasticity in water saturated condition prewetted and with the greater volume of LWA in the same volume of paste [24][25][26]. And most importantly, in current standard methods, the shrinkage of LAC is usually estimated from the expressions defined for NWC and always gets higher value than those measured in practice [24,28]. For the proper prediction of shrinkage, the special characteristics of LAC should be considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%