2002
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.65.064430
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence ofsdinterfacial scattering on the magnetoresistance of magnetic tunnel junctions

Abstract: We propose the two-band s-d model to describe theoretically a diffuse regime of the spin-dependent electron transport in magnetic tunnel junctions (MTJ's) of the form F/O/F where F's are 3d transition metal ferromagnetic layers and O is the insulating spacer. We aim to explain the strong interface sensitivity of the tunneling properties of MTJ's and investigate the influence of electron scattering at the nonideal interfaces on the degradation of the TMR magnitude. The generalized Kubo formalism and the Green's… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the influence of the barrier termination on the atomic and electronic structure in Co/Al 2 O 3 /Co junctions is pointed out by Oleinik et al 14 The spin polarization can also be effected by the actual profile of the potential barrier, 15,16 the disorder in the barrier, 17 and the mechanism of bonding at the interface between the barrier and the electrode. 18 The degrading influence of nonideal interfaces on the TMR is discussed recently by Bagrets et al 19 If the TMR at 4.2 K and 300 K is compared for different scattering parameters ␥ ͑see Fig. 8 in Ref.…”
Section: Area Resistance Product and Tunneling Magnetoresistancementioning
confidence: 93%
“…For example, the influence of the barrier termination on the atomic and electronic structure in Co/Al 2 O 3 /Co junctions is pointed out by Oleinik et al 14 The spin polarization can also be effected by the actual profile of the potential barrier, 15,16 the disorder in the barrier, 17 and the mechanism of bonding at the interface between the barrier and the electrode. 18 The degrading influence of nonideal interfaces on the TMR is discussed recently by Bagrets et al 19 If the TMR at 4.2 K and 300 K is compared for different scattering parameters ␥ ͑see Fig. 8 in Ref.…”
Section: Area Resistance Product and Tunneling Magnetoresistancementioning
confidence: 93%
“…But recently Bagrets et al 18 calculated the tunneling magnetoresistance as a function of a scattering parameter ␥ in the case of elastic scattering on the interfaces only. It is evident from Eq.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This relative hot-electron efficiency decrease can be attributed to the structural changes near the barrier interfaces with increasing Ta thickness, for example caused by s-d interfacial scattering. 13 Similarly, these structural changes may cause the observed decrease of the MR ratio with increasing Ta thickness.…”
Section: Photoconductancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 Alternatively it might be of extrinsic origin, related to a lower structural quality of the tunnel barrier, e.g., caused by defects or impurities. 12,13 It is difficult to extract information on the tunneling spin polarization itself in these heavy metal oxide barriers, as shown by Kant et al 14 Instead, we will focus on the structural origin of the electron transport characteristics. In this paper we present results from a systematic study of the dependence of the MR ratio on the thickness of TaO x barrier layers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%