2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10854-016-4741-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Mn doping on structural and magnetic properties of Ti1−xMnxO2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the number of BMPs that were determined from M 0 and m eff values is on the order of 10 15 per cm 3 . However, the number of BMPs was found to be consistent with previously published data .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the other hand, the number of BMPs that were determined from M 0 and m eff values is on the order of 10 15 per cm 3 . However, the number of BMPs was found to be consistent with previously published data .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Figure depicts the XRD patterns of the Ti 1−x Cu x O 2 (x = 0.02, 0.04, and 0.06) samples annealed at 500°C (TC2, TC4, and TC6) as well as the TiO 2 :0.02Cu samples annealed at 600 and 700°C (TC2‐600 and RTC2‐700), along with the pattern of dopant‐free TiO 2 as a reference. It can be seen that the dominant crystal phase was the rutile‐type, in addition to a very small amount of diffraction lines attributed to anatase‐type . Detailed XRD analysis also revealed a slight shifting of the diffraction peaks towards the lower angles for the Cu‐doped samples compared to the dopant‐free TiO 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For rutile D decreased from 124 to 22.5 nm. Analogous observation of the influence of Mn-doping on crystallite nanosize of TiO 2 matrices was also found in previous articles [18,24,25,28,29]. This reduction in the crystallite sizes might be attributed to the lattice distortion caused by the difference in ionic radii of Mn cations (herein Mn 2+ and Mn 3+ ) and Ti 4+ ions which limits the growth rate [18,25,28,29].…”
Section: Structural Xrd Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…However, Mn 3+ could only be detected as Mn 2 O 3 in case of x= 0.1. Therefore, it can be pointed out that the lattice unit expansion is mainly due to the larger Mn 2+ ions which were successfully incorporated into the titania lattice crystallographic structure at the Ti 4+ sites [3,24,25]. The slight increase observed thereafter is reasonably attributed to the coexistence of Mn 2+ and Mn 3+ ions.…”
Section: Structural Xrd Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%