2017
DOI: 10.1063/1.5002768
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of movement direction on levitation performance and energy dissipation in a superconducting maglev system

Abstract: During the regular operation of a maglev system, the superconducting levitation body may move away from the working position due to the external disturbance and the curved part of the guideway. Based on the A − V formulation of magnetoquasistatic Maxwell’s equations, in this paper, a two-dimensional numerical model is applied to study the influence of movement direction on a typical maglev system consisting of an infinitely long high-temperature superconductor and a guideway of two infinitely long parallel per… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figures 3(c) and (d) show the temperature evolution during vibration. In general, flux vortices will move in and out as the SC oscillates, resulting in the redistribution of induced currents and the energy dissipation [33]. As a consequence, the temperature profile becomes very complex in the SC.…”
Section: Dynamic Movement Of the Sc Without Rotationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figures 3(c) and (d) show the temperature evolution during vibration. In general, flux vortices will move in and out as the SC oscillates, resulting in the redistribution of induced currents and the energy dissipation [33]. As a consequence, the temperature profile becomes very complex in the SC.…”
Section: Dynamic Movement Of the Sc Without Rotationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many experimental and theoretical works have studied the levitation force and static stability by changing the system parameters, such as, on the one hand, the dimensions, cooling process, critical current density and working point of the SC and, on the other hand, the number, size, horizontal interval and magnetization of the PMs in the guideway [23][24][25][26]. Moreover, based on Maxwell's equations, a series of formulations such as A-V, T-ω and H have been proposed to analyze the time-dependent levitation for maglev systems in two-dimensional (2D) or even 3D cases, where the SC is usually assumed to move along some virtual displacement [27][28][29][30][31][32][33]. Such displacement is not necessarily equal to the one followed by the system after a perturbation of equilibrium.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, we performed simulations using other two numerical methods for comparison in order to check the validity of the implementation of the numerical model with H formulation in the commercial software package COMSOL Multiphysics [58,59]. Similar to H formulation, numerical simulations with H − f formulation [60,61] is also implemented in COMSOL Multiphysics, while we performed A − V formulation [62,63] by home-brewed code using MATLAB programming language, which does not need a very large air Figure 3. Thermomagnetic stability/instability diagram in the n − Γ plane (here, the n is U 0 /kT).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%