2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.physc.2015.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of multi-orbital hopping and anisotropy in intra and inter orbital Coulomb interactions on the electronic spectra in iron pnictide superconductors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 1 shows the possible hopping parameters existing among d xz , d yz, and d xy orbitals. [ 43 ] The nearest neighbor hopping between σ‐orbitals of d xz and d yz is shown by t 1 parameter and between π ‐orbitals of d xz and d yz is presented by t 2 . The second nearest neighbor hopping between similar orbitals d xz and d yz is shown by t 3 and between different orbitals of d xz /d yz is presented by t 4 .…”
Section: Model Hamiltonian and Theoretical Formalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Figure 1 shows the possible hopping parameters existing among d xz , d yz, and d xy orbitals. [ 43 ] The nearest neighbor hopping between σ‐orbitals of d xz and d yz is shown by t 1 parameter and between π ‐orbitals of d xz and d yz is presented by t 2 . The second nearest neighbor hopping between similar orbitals d xz and d yz is shown by t 3 and between different orbitals of d xz /d yz is presented by t 4 .…”
Section: Model Hamiltonian and Theoretical Formalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To study the specific heat as a function of various orbital hopping parameters, the following six coupled Green's function equations within BCS mean‐field approximation have been developed in the situation where J H may provide an order parameter that can be treated as a PG parameter ( Δ normalH = Δ PG ) due to anti‐ferromagnetic ordered background in Fe‐3 d orbitals. [ 41,43 ] Therefore false{ ω false( ε 1 k + U n 1 + U n 2 false) false} C 1 k σ false| C 1 k σ + ω = 1 2 π + ε 12 k C 2 k σ false| C 1 k σ + ω + ( Δ k 11 + Δ PG 22 ) C 1 k σ + false| C 1 k σ + ω false{ ω + false( ε 1 k + U n 1 + U n 2 false) false} C 1 k σ + false| C 1 k σ + ω = ( Δ k 11 + + Δ…”
Section: Model Hamiltonian and Theoretical Formalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations