1997
DOI: 10.1007/s005720050176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of mycorrhization on physiological parameters of micropropagated Castanea sativa Mill. plants

Abstract: Mycorrhizal micropropagated Castanea sativa plants were studied in terms of growth and physiological parameters following in vitro mycorrhization with Pisolithus tinctorius. Mycorrhization enhanced growth of micropropagated chestnut plants, increased their protein content and photosynthetic rates, decreased the respiratory rates and CO 2 compensation point. RuBisCO activity was not significantly different in mycorrhizal and control plants, although there was an increase in the amount of RuBisCO in the former. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As already reported, micropropagated chestnut plants showed increased growth and photosynthetic rates following in vitro mycorrhization with P. tinctorius (Martins et al 1996(Martins et al , 1997. The higher phosphate content in these plants revealed by both NMR and chemical analysis is in agreement with our previous results.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As already reported, micropropagated chestnut plants showed increased growth and photosynthetic rates following in vitro mycorrhization with P. tinctorius (Martins et al 1996(Martins et al , 1997. The higher phosphate content in these plants revealed by both NMR and chemical analysis is in agreement with our previous results.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…They suggest that at high irradiance there is a positive mycorrhizal growth response in plants grown without additional P. In contrast, a reduced or negative mycorrhizal growth response occurs under low irradiance conditions, although the extent of the infection was similar (Son and Smith 1988). Micropropagated chestnut plants showed increased growth and photosynthetic rates following in vitro mycorrhization with P. tinctorius (Martins et al 1996(Martins et al , 1997.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mycorrhizal symbiosis is frequently associated with increased photosynthetic rates of mycorrhizal plants (Harley and Smith, 1983;Reid et al, 1983;Bougher et al, 1990;Dosskey et al, 1990;Rousseau and Reid, 1990;Guehl and Garbaye, 1990;Jones et al, 1990;Martins, 1992;Martins et al, 1997;Smith and Read, 1997). ECM may influence the assimilation capacity for CO 2 in two distinct forms: increased absorption of P and N in mycorrhizal plants influence the photosynthetic rates, as observed for forestry species when amended with P; the other resulting from enhanced flux of carbon compounds to the roots, promoted by mycorrhizal associations (Martins et al, 1997;1999). This hypothesis considers that the increased photosynthetic rates are related with the fungus necessity of carbon compounds and is named source-sink concept (Dosskey et al, 1990;1991) although this seems to be just one of mechanism involved in photosynthetic increment in mycorrhizal plants (Martins et al, 1997;1999).…”
Section: Effect Of Mycorrhiza Inoculation On Plant Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Martins et al, 1996).The fungi tested differed in their capacity to form mycorrhizas with C. sativa plants in vitro. P. tinctorius showed the best capacity to colonize chestnut roots either from seedlings or from micropropagated plants (Martins et al, 1996(Martins et al, , 1997.…”
Section: Mycorrhization Of Micropropageted Plantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the poor knowledge of their biodiversity, ecology or sustainable management in those regions, mushroom harvesting is increasing, mainly due to their economic importance to local populations (Baptista et al, 2010). Among the ectomycorrhizal (ECM) fungi known for having positive effects on plant hosts, e.g., (Martins, 1997;Martins et al, 1997), Laccaria laccata, Hebeloma crustuliniforme, H. sinapizans and Paxillus involutus (Branzanti et al, 1999), a special dedication has been devoted to P. arhizus and P. involutus (Carocho et al, 2012;Reis et al, 2011;Reis et al, 2012). Our research group conducted a few studies on symbiotic associations using Pinus pinaster as the plant host (Carocho et al, 2012;Reis et al, 2011;Reis et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%