2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.124675
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of new superhydrophobic micro-structures on delaying ice formation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Obviously, the droplet dynamics contact angle (CA) with a wall surface is the most important parameter for drop motion on solid surface. The equilibrium CA, which shows the balance of energy release and small-scale dissipation, is calculated by the Young relation [14]: 𝜎 𝑠𝑙 + 𝜎 cos πœƒ 𝑒 = 𝜎 𝑠𝑔 (13) At dynamic conditions, the CA is assumed to be locally calculated by the Young relation (Eq. ( 13)).…”
Section: Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Obviously, the droplet dynamics contact angle (CA) with a wall surface is the most important parameter for drop motion on solid surface. The equilibrium CA, which shows the balance of energy release and small-scale dissipation, is calculated by the Young relation [14]: 𝜎 𝑠𝑙 + 𝜎 cos πœƒ 𝑒 = 𝜎 𝑠𝑔 (13) At dynamic conditions, the CA is assumed to be locally calculated by the Young relation (Eq. ( 13)).…”
Section: Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Determination of the dynamic CA is very sensitive and different relations are used to determine it more accurately both theoretically and even empirically [22]. Dynamic contact angle models, including hydrodynamic models, molecular kinetic models, experimental models, as well as hybrid models are developed to obtain accurate contact angle and meniscus displacement [14]. Most of these models give the relationship between the contact line velocity and the dynamic contact angle.…”
Section: Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Bian et al 30 experimentally observed the morphology and growth process of ice on different near-thermal insulating surfaces at low subcooling, and found that, as the contact angle of the ice core increases, the radius of the tip increases and the effect of heat conduction on the tip decreases, leading to a slowdown in the growth rate of the tip. Ramin et al 31 used the phase field method to establish and validate a numerical approach to model the effect of different structured surfaces on ice crystal growth, and they found that microstructures with larger grooves on the upper surface than on the lower surface may result in lower surface humidity. Kobayashi 32 established a numerical model to show the morphology of dendritic ice crystal growth, and they found that the velocity of the main branches increased with the anisotropy strength.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%