2007
DOI: 10.1093/jee/100.5.1560
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Nezara viridula Feeding on Cotton Yield, Fiber Quality, and Seed Germination

Abstract: The influence of southern green stink bug, Nezara viridula (L.), adults (males and females) and fourth to fifth instars on cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L., boll abscission, seedcotton yield, fiber quality, and seed viability was evaluated in field studies conducted during 2004 and 2005. Cotton bolls representing several age classes ranging from 0-600 heat units were individually infested with a specific gender or life stage of southern green stink bug. Adults and nymphs induced abscission of bolls that accumulat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Barbour et al (1990) suggested that Þber qualities may be reduced as a result of stink bug feeding. Similar to our Þndings, , Bommireddy et al (2007), and Roberts et al (2007) found that stink bug feeding negatively impacted Þber quality categories based on AFIS and HVI analyses.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Barbour et al (1990) suggested that Þber qualities may be reduced as a result of stink bug feeding. Similar to our Þndings, , Bommireddy et al (2007), and Roberts et al (2007) found that stink bug feeding negatively impacted Þber quality categories based on AFIS and HVI analyses.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Understanding the population dynamics of stink bugs in cotton and other agronomic hosts is important because the proximity and type of crop grown adjacent to cotton can affect the value of cotton within a Þeld (Toews and Shurley 2009). Developing cotton bolls are injured by the feeding activity of stink bugs, and this damage decreases the value of cotton by reducing yields and Þber quality (Willrich et al 2004a,b;Bommireddy et al 2007;Toews and Shurley 2009). Although stink bugs have been reported as an occasional pest in cotton Þelds for more than a century, their recent upsurge is believed to be due the advent of Bacillus thurengiensis technology combined with the boll weevil [Anthonomus grandis grandis Boheman] eradication program that reduced the number of insecticide sprays, which provided indirect control of stink bug populations (Glover 1855, Morrill 1910, Greene and Herzog 1999.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the southeast, the green stink bug, Acrosternum hilare (Say), brown stink bug, Euschistus servus (Say), and southern green stink bug, Nezara viridula L., are the predominant pests ). Along with other phytophagous pentatomids, they reduce yield and lint quality by feeding on developing bolls, resulting in boll deformation, reduced yield and lint/ seed quality, and boll abscission (Wene and Sheets 1964, Toscano and Stern 1976, Barbour et al 1990, Greene et al 2000, Roberts et al 2005, Goerger et al 2006, Bommireddy et al 2007). Feeding of stink bugs also allows entry of microorganisms that may contribute to physiological damage and degradation of fruit (anonymous 1981, Verma 1986, Panizzi 1997, Medrano et al 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%