2017
DOI: 10.1017/s1431927617000204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Noise-Generating Factors on Cross-Correlation Electron Backscatter Diffraction (EBSD) Measurement of Geometrically Necessary Dislocations (GNDs)

Abstract: Studies of dislocation density evolution are fundamental to improved understanding in various areas of deformation mechanics. Recent advances in cross-correlation techniques, applied to electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) data have particularly shed light on geometrically necessary dislocation (GND) behavior. However, the framework is relatively computationally expensive-patterns are typically saved from the EBSD scan and analyzed offline. A better understanding of the impact of EBSD pattern degradation, s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To this end, the mean strain error (✏ E ) is plotted over increasing noise levels reaching 20%, with insets visually showing the noise in EBSPs and residuals. At fairly large noise levels of up to 5%, the strain errors remain relatively small (below 10 5 ), whereas a further increase of the noise causes lower accuracies, but remarkably still below 10 4 for extreme noise of 20% (which is comparably noisy to "Poisson noise level 16" from [39]), though at the expense of an increase in the number of iterations required for proper convergence. Note that, in IDIC, the image residual field is often recommended as a powerful tool to evaluate the performance of the algorithm in experiments and to assess the correlation convergence and possible systematic errors in the underlying model, which can be identified from regions in the residual field with increased amplitude, as, e.g., demonstrated in [40].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, the mean strain error (✏ E ) is plotted over increasing noise levels reaching 20%, with insets visually showing the noise in EBSPs and residuals. At fairly large noise levels of up to 5%, the strain errors remain relatively small (below 10 5 ), whereas a further increase of the noise causes lower accuracies, but remarkably still below 10 4 for extreme noise of 20% (which is comparably noisy to "Poisson noise level 16" from [39]), though at the expense of an increase in the number of iterations required for proper convergence. Note that, in IDIC, the image residual field is often recommended as a powerful tool to evaluate the performance of the algorithm in experiments and to assess the correlation convergence and possible systematic errors in the underlying model, which can be identified from regions in the residual field with increased amplitude, as, e.g., demonstrated in [40].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resolution of the images was incrementally reduced by simply binning the original patterns (1024 Â 1024 resolution) as they were read into the algorithm. Poisson noise was introduced into the experimental patterns as they were read into the algorithm using the method reported by Hansen et al (2017). The noise and resolution were varied independently.…”
Section: Pattern Quality Sensitivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work presented here is part of a collaborative effort involving experimental work [10][11][12][13], mesoscale modeling [14,15], and atomistic simulations [16] aimed at better understanding how large populations of dislocations interact with GBs. The present work contributes by investigating the attributes that affect the GB-dislocation interactions at the atomic scale, which can then be used to inform the mesoscale modeling and interpret experimental observations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%