2015
DOI: 10.1682/jrrd.2014.03.0070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of noncircular chainring on male physiological parameters in hand cycling

Abstract: Abstract-The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of a noncircular chainring (NCC) compared with a conventional circular chainring (CC) on hand cycling performance. Eleven nondisabled male participants with no hand cycling experience initially completed an incremental exercise test. Afterward, the participants completed two 20 s sprint tests, followed by a 20 min endurance test and then another two 20 s sprint tests. An NCC and a CC were used in random order on two separate occasions. To compare … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The ability to make a closed-chain movement seemed to be a great advantage, as the results showed a significant improvement of 11% in PO mean (281 vs 254 W) and 25% in PO peak (415 vs 332 W) in the condition with 2-feet support compared with no foot support and an improvement of 10% in PO mean (279 vs 254 W) in the condition with 1-foot support compared with no foot support. The results of the condition with 2-feet support are in line with the results of a previous study by Zeller et al (12). That study reported a PO mean between 300 and 400 W and a PO peak between 400 and 500 W during an isokinetic sprint test.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The ability to make a closed-chain movement seemed to be a great advantage, as the results showed a significant improvement of 11% in PO mean (281 vs 254 W) and 25% in PO peak (415 vs 332 W) in the condition with 2-feet support compared with no foot support and an improvement of 10% in PO mean (279 vs 254 W) in the condition with 1-foot support compared with no foot support. The results of the condition with 2-feet support are in line with the results of a previous study by Zeller et al (12). That study reported a PO mean between 300 and 400 W and a PO peak between 400 and 500 W during an isokinetic sprint test.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…After these submaximal exercise tests, there was a 5-min rest, followed by an isokinetic sprint test. In accordance with Zeller et al (12), the test lasted 20 s, with an initial load of 20 N, with www.medicaljournals.se/jrm a maximum cadence of 110 rpm for the test in the AP-bike and 80 rpm for the test in the ATP-bike. Peak power output (PO peak ) was defined as the highest PO and mean power output (PO mean ) as the mean PO during the 20-s test.…”
Section: Test Protocolmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As race distances range between 20 and 30 km for time trials and between 50 and 80 km for road races with mass starts, dependent on gender and classification, endurance capacity is one of the main performance determinants in handcycling. To date there are two exercise test procedures primarily applied to determine endurance capacity in handcycling; the lactate minimum test (LMT) (Perret et al, 2012) and the graded exercise test (GXT) to exhaustion (Zeller et al, 2015). The obtained test results allow the analysis of current endurance capacity to verify training adaptations and are routinely used as a time-efficient alternative to predict maximum lactate steady state (MLSS) (Jones and Doust, 1998; Billat et al, 2003; Faude et al, 2009; Adam et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Por fim, 18 artigos foram excluídos por tratar do estudo de pedivelas assimétricos, ou por estudar o uso de CNC, em handbike (tipo de equipamento utilizado por ciclistas sem a movimentação das pernas). De todas referências encontradas, foram excluídas as que não se tratavam de CNC, ou que apresentavam uso de CNC em bicicletas que não são convencionais, como foi o caso de um único artigo que relatou os efeitos fisiológicos em para-ciclistas que utilizaram CNC em suas handbike 20 . Por fim, 13 artigos foram selecionados para esta revisão, pois compararam os efeitos do uso de CC e CNC sobre o desempenho e nas variáveis biomecânicas e fisiológicas de ciclistas.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified