2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00421-009-1255-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of nonthermal baroreceptor modulation of heat loss responses during uncompensable heat stress

Abstract: We evaluated the hypothesis that with increasing levels of hyperthermia, thermal influences would predominate over nonthermal baroreceptor control of cutaneous vascular conductance (CVC) and local sweat rate (LSR). On separate days, eight male participants were positioned in either an upright seated posture (URS) or a 15 degrees head-down tilt (HDT) posture in a thermoneutral condition and during passive heating, until mean body temperature (T(body)) increased by 1.5 degrees C. Hemodynamic [heart rate (HR), ca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, multiple studies involving a range of techniques designed to elicit baroreflex unloading, including passive heat stress coupled with lower body negative pressure, head up tilt, or infusion of pharmacological agents, have demonstrated no effect on sweating rates during passive heat stress. Kenny et al (2010) observed no difference in sweating or cutaneous blood flow during upright seated versus 15° head-down tilt during passive heating, confirming earlier results. Similarly, Schlader et al (2015) observed an attenuated vasodilation with cardiopulmonary and arterial baroreceptor unloading, but no effect on sweating rate during passive heat stress.…”
Section: Baroreceptor Unloadingsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Similarly, multiple studies involving a range of techniques designed to elicit baroreflex unloading, including passive heat stress coupled with lower body negative pressure, head up tilt, or infusion of pharmacological agents, have demonstrated no effect on sweating rates during passive heat stress. Kenny et al (2010) observed no difference in sweating or cutaneous blood flow during upright seated versus 15° head-down tilt during passive heating, confirming earlier results. Similarly, Schlader et al (2015) observed an attenuated vasodilation with cardiopulmonary and arterial baroreceptor unloading, but no effect on sweating rate during passive heat stress.…”
Section: Baroreceptor Unloadingsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Previous studies suggested that the contribution of nonthermal factors to modulation of heat loss responses is attenuated with progressive increases in hyperthermia (7,16,17). Specifically, Kondo et al (17) demonstrated that increases in sweat rate during IHG exercise became significantly attenuated with moderate increases in core temperature (ϳ0.3°C).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Furthermore, SkBF was not measured during this study; as such, there remains a critical gap in our understanding of the role of baroreflex activity on SkBF during post-IHG exercise ischemia. Finally, a number of studies suggest that the relative influence of nonthermal factors in modulating thermoefferent activity can change as a function of the level of hyperthermia (7,16,17). For example, Kondo et al.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Owing to instances of hypotension following volume depletion, body posture was adjusted from an upright seated position to a supine posture (note that seven total subjects were tested, with four seated in the upright position and three supine). Although postural differences with heat stress influence baroreflex control of SkBF (Lind et al 1968), it should be noted that: (i) all analyses were performed within subject, with the position of a given subject consistent between all three trials; (ii) perturbations that unload baroreceptors do not appear to alter thermoregulatory sweat rate (Wilson et al 2005;Kenny et al 2010;Lynn et al 2012); (iii) comparisons within posture still revealed no effect of treatment on P crit for core temperature, metabolic rate, whole-body sweat rate, LSR mean and T sk ; and (iv) the slightly higher P crit for core temperature in the upright seated position (CON, 5.2 ± 0.1 kPa; DEH, 5.0 ± 0.2 kPa; and SAL, 5.2 ± 0.1 kPa; n = 4) compared with the supine posture (CON, 4.9 ± 0.4 kPa; DEH, 4.9 ± 0.1 kPa; and SAL, 5.1 ± 0.1 kPa; n = 3) can be explained by the greater effective skin area from which heat loss could occur while seated.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%