2016
DOI: 10.1080/10426914.2016.1257132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of nozzle design and process parameters on surface roughness of CFRP machined by abrasive jet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zhang et al [66] found that cutting width and depth decreased with decrease in nozzle diameter. Madhu and Balasubramanian [67] used machined nozzles with and without internal thread to compare their effect on the SR of CFRP laminate using abrasive analysis at similar machining conditions. Threaded nozzle reduced the machining time and improved the MRR by 92% compared to without threaded nozzle.…”
Section: Effect Of Nozzle Geometry and Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang et al [66] found that cutting width and depth decreased with decrease in nozzle diameter. Madhu and Balasubramanian [67] used machined nozzles with and without internal thread to compare their effect on the SR of CFRP laminate using abrasive analysis at similar machining conditions. Threaded nozzle reduced the machining time and improved the MRR by 92% compared to without threaded nozzle.…”
Section: Effect Of Nozzle Geometry and Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increasing pressure will reduce the kerf taper, but machinability also increased. The experimental results showed that the minimum kerf taper of 0.029 obtained from 45° fiber orientation in CFRP laminate for maximum pressure (Madhu and Balasubramanian, 2017a, 2017b).…”
Section: Influence Of Abrasive Jet Machining On Process Parametersmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This might ensue to the jet being constrained to hold a heavier load at the identical pressure. With 50 mm abrasive particles delivered from the medium diameter nozzle (2.5 mm), the MRR is high (Madhu and Balasubramanian, 2017a, 2017b).…”
Section: Machining Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The benefits of RMA are (i) instance change of one location to another location, (ii) improving in the life of used tool, and (iii) can be used for 3D feature shapes. Madhu and Balasubramanian (2017) investigated the effect of newly designed with and without internal thread nozzles pressure, SOD, abrasive size and nozzle diameter as process parameters, while surface roughness (Ra) was response calculated experimentally on Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) composite material. The results show that good surface finish with minimum internal threaded nozzle diameter, SOD, lower particle size and maximum Pressure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%