1999
DOI: 10.1023/a:1001888629613
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Obstacles on the Aerodynamic Roughness of the Netherlands

Abstract: The aim of this study was to analyse the influence of large-and small-scale obstacles (orography, tree lines, and dikes) on the effective aerodynamic roughness of the Netherlands, a relatively flat, small-scale landscape. The roughness averaging approach was based on drag coefficients. The effective roughness was locally dominated by small-scale obstacles such as tree lines and dikes. Even at a regional scale (40,000 km 2), the small-scale obstacle drag was of the same order of magnitude as the shear stress du… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[, Figures 20 and A1] on the basis of large‐eddy simulations (LES). From all this, it would appear that while the measurements at 32 m provide a better estimate of regional conditions than those at 12 m and definitely than those at 2 m, the blending height of the measurements at the Changwu station is likely higher than 32 m. Note that some studies, albeit in flat terrain, have indicated that the effect of the choice of the blending height in roughness estimations is relatively small [e.g., Bottema et al ., ; De Jong et al ., ], and thus perhaps negligible for practical purposes. This would suggest that the estimate of z0=0.5 m by Li et al .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[, Figures 20 and A1] on the basis of large‐eddy simulations (LES). From all this, it would appear that while the measurements at 32 m provide a better estimate of regional conditions than those at 12 m and definitely than those at 2 m, the blending height of the measurements at the Changwu station is likely higher than 32 m. Note that some studies, albeit in flat terrain, have indicated that the effect of the choice of the blending height in roughness estimations is relatively small [e.g., Bottema et al ., ; De Jong et al ., ], and thus perhaps negligible for practical purposes. This would suggest that the estimate of z0=0.5 m by Li et al .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…yielding a roughness length of z 0 ≈ 0.55 m, which is representative of the site [20]. Furthermore, a spectral tensor Φ(κ; L, α 2/3 , Γ) according to [21], was set up with L ≈ 25 m, α 2/3 ≈ 0.16 m 4/3 /s 2 , and Γ ≈ 3.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the roughness of a patchy landscape is not always a weighed average of the elements, but might even exceed the roughness of the roughest element (Bottema et al, 1998). The large roughness is attributed to additional momentum absorption at changes in vegetation height, in particular forest edges and tree lines (De Jong et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%