2001
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1583
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of oestrus synchronization on male reproductive success in the domestic cat ( Felis catus L.)

Abstract: Previous studies have predicted that the availability over time of females in oestrus in£uences the variance of male reproductive success in a given year. When females are spatially aggregated, they represent a potentially defendable resource for each male when oestrus is asynchronous, and the most competitive males are expected to gain priority of access to receptive females. When females breed synchronously, a single male, even when highly competitive, is not able to prevent them from mating with other males… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
63
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most conceptions occur in a relatively short period of time (2-4 weeks in temperate populations- Marchinton and Hirth 1984). The overall spatial dispersion of females within populations combined with temporal synchro- ny of estrus would limit the number of estrous females an individual male can locate and breed, allowing more males access to mating opportunities (e.g., Say et al 2001). Finally, there is evidence for female promiscuity in white-tailed deer (DeYoung et al 2002(DeYoung et al , 2006Sorin 2004), which may further enhance chances of successful mating by males of all age classes (e.g., Pemberton et al 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most conceptions occur in a relatively short period of time (2-4 weeks in temperate populations- Marchinton and Hirth 1984). The overall spatial dispersion of females within populations combined with temporal synchro- ny of estrus would limit the number of estrous females an individual male can locate and breed, allowing more males access to mating opportunities (e.g., Say et al 2001). Finally, there is evidence for female promiscuity in white-tailed deer (DeYoung et al 2002(DeYoung et al , 2006Sorin 2004), which may further enhance chances of successful mating by males of all age classes (e.g., Pemberton et al 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the marked breeding synchrony that necessary results from these time constraints presumably limits the number of partners that a male may fertilize (Say et al 2001). As a result, choosing a sister would jeopardize other mating opportunities, thereby suppressing the potential benefits of inbreeding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LeBoeuf 1974;Clutton-Brock et al 1982;Poole 1989;Moore et al 1995;Preston et al 2001;Say et al 2001). In primates, the advantage of high rank is pronounced, although variable both within and across species (reviewed in Cowlishaw & Dunbar 1991;Bulger 1993;Alberts et al 2003;Altmann & Alberts 2003a).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The priority of access model has also proved useful in understanding male reproductive skew in other mammal species (e.g. Say et al 2001;Engh et al 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%