2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2008.01.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of optimised treatment of people with hip fracture on time to operation, length of hospital stay, reoperations and mortality within 1 year

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

17
104
2
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
17
104
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Functional status before fracture, older age, male gender, and higher surgical risk increased the risk of mortality, whereas the use of antibiotics and physical therapy after surgery decreased the risk. Previous studies showed functional status before fracture [14,42,45,52], male gender [12,15,28,33,36,42,47], older age [10,15,28,36,43,47,50,52,55], and higher ASA scores predicted mortality in older patients [24,26,33,44,49] (Table 3), which is in agreement with our findings. In our study, we did not see a difference in mortality between patients undergoing arthroplasty versus patients undergoing osteosynthesis, which is in agreement with mortality reported by Garcia et al [15] and others [18,33,37].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Functional status before fracture, older age, male gender, and higher surgical risk increased the risk of mortality, whereas the use of antibiotics and physical therapy after surgery decreased the risk. Previous studies showed functional status before fracture [14,42,45,52], male gender [12,15,28,33,36,42,47], older age [10,15,28,36,43,47,50,52,55], and higher ASA scores predicted mortality in older patients [24,26,33,44,49] (Table 3), which is in agreement with our findings. In our study, we did not see a difference in mortality between patients undergoing arthroplasty versus patients undergoing osteosynthesis, which is in agreement with mortality reported by Garcia et al [15] and others [18,33,37].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…They had no waiting time for rehabilitation at all. In contrast, Hommel et al did not find any significant differences between patients with different kinds of operation types [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…A recent review by Leigheb et al showed similar reductions in the hospital length of stay in eight out of 12 studies [6]. Three studies reported a longer hospital stay [14][15][16] and one did not find any difference after implementing a clinical pathway [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This routine includes steps such as giving patients with a suspected hip fracture fluids and pain relief in the ambulance and transiting the patient rapidly from the ambulance to the orthopaedic ward directly after radiography. Fast-track care for hip fracture patients can minimise complications, increase priorities and decrease length of stay (LOS) (Hommel et al, 2008;Larsson and Holgers, 2011;Leigheb et al, 2013). Surgery within 24 hours following fracture reduces hospital stay and may also reduce complications and mortality (Al-Ani et al, 2008;Simunovic et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%