2012
DOI: 10.1007/s12548-012-0044-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of oral appliances for mandibular advancement on occlusal function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results agree with those obtained by Chen et al [49]. Overall, it was concluded that the sagittal tooth relationship between the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth saw a reduction with the continuous use of MADs, irrespective of the design and materials used [18,24,25,31,34,49,50]. In recent systematic reviews, MADs for OSA may reportedly tilt the mandibular incisors to 1.54 ± 0.16°labially, reduce the OJ by 0.89 ± 0.04 mm, reduce the OB by 0.68 ± 0.04 mm, and rotate the mandible downward [13].…”
Section: Dental Cast Assessmentsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results agree with those obtained by Chen et al [49]. Overall, it was concluded that the sagittal tooth relationship between the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth saw a reduction with the continuous use of MADs, irrespective of the design and materials used [18,24,25,31,34,49,50]. In recent systematic reviews, MADs for OSA may reportedly tilt the mandibular incisors to 1.54 ± 0.16°labially, reduce the OJ by 0.89 ± 0.04 mm, reduce the OB by 0.68 ± 0.04 mm, and rotate the mandible downward [13].…”
Section: Dental Cast Assessmentsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The short-term continuous use of an MAD has been reported to lead to temporomandibular joint discomfort upon waking up, excessive salivation, intraoral and lip dryness, and improper tooth contact upon removing the MAD [23][24][25]. However, patients find that these symptoms improve throughout the day, and the level of discomfort is reportedly minimal [17,18,[26][27][28][29][30]. On the contrary, long-term dental changes or changes in occlusion are harder for the patients to notice [16]; these include OJ and OB reduction, a forward shift of the mandibular molars, and increased maximal opening [24][25][26][31][32][33][34].…”
Section: Cephalometric Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The net amount of force that is required for tooth movement mainly depends on the root surface [ 22 ]. Interestingly, in our previous study, the mobility of the lower incisors immediately after nocturnal use of OA was the highest among all teeth, followed by the upper incisors [ 23 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%