“…We identified a mean ± standard deviation quality score for the 50 selected articles of 79 ± 13%. Several papers (N = 20), accounting for 40% of the total literature, were classified as 80-90% [13, 14, 16, 17, 19, 24, 26, 29, 30, 33, 38, 41, 42, 48, 49, 52-54, 57, 60]; in addition, six papers (12%) received very high ratings of between 90 and 100% [15,18,20,46,47,51]. A total of 72% of the papers (N = 36 publications [12-20, 24, 26, 28-30, 32, 33, 38, 40-43, 46-49, 51-54, 56-58, 60-63]) reached an appropriate quality score, being classified as > 75% [34], and this was not the case for the remaining articles (28%; N = 14 publications [23,27,31,37,39,44,45,50,55,59,[64][65][66][67]).…”