2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2021.10.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of PACE score and conduction disturbances in the incidence of early new onset atrial fibrillation after typical atrial flutter ablation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Implantable cardiac monitors have also been used for surveillance after AF ablation. 9 Factors that predict AF after flutter ablation include LA enlargement, 19–21 inducible AF at the time of flutter ablation, 22,23 interatrial conduction time, 24 prolonged HV interval, 25 COPD, 26 obstructive sleep apnea, 20 and HATCH (hypertension, age ≥75 years, TIA or stroke, COPD, heart failure) score. 21 One study that reported new-onset AF in 38% of patients after AFL ablation demonstrated a thromboembolic event rate of 10% during a mean follow-up of 5 years.…”
Section: Prevention Of Thromboembolismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Implantable cardiac monitors have also been used for surveillance after AF ablation. 9 Factors that predict AF after flutter ablation include LA enlargement, 19–21 inducible AF at the time of flutter ablation, 22,23 interatrial conduction time, 24 prolonged HV interval, 25 COPD, 26 obstructive sleep apnea, 20 and HATCH (hypertension, age ≥75 years, TIA or stroke, COPD, heart failure) score. 21 One study that reported new-onset AF in 38% of patients after AFL ablation demonstrated a thromboembolic event rate of 10% during a mean follow-up of 5 years.…”
Section: Prevention Of Thromboembolismmentioning
confidence: 99%