2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.eas.2023.100028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of pathogens specific subclinical mastitis on oxidative status and mineral metabolism of yak

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 33 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The assessment of mastitis by means of visual examinations combined with the California Mastitis Test (see Table 1) revealed that none of the chauris assessed had mastitis. This was not an unexpected result because yaks and their hybrids traditionally have a lower incidence of mastitis compared to cattle [38]; however, a recent study by Biswas et al [39] identified subclinical mastitis in 16% of the quarters of a yak herd. The significant impact of mastitis on milk quality and safety combined with the importance of milk and its products to yak herders [39] suggests that the benefits of testing for mastitis when there are issues may more than justify the high proportion of tests during which no problems are identified.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The assessment of mastitis by means of visual examinations combined with the California Mastitis Test (see Table 1) revealed that none of the chauris assessed had mastitis. This was not an unexpected result because yaks and their hybrids traditionally have a lower incidence of mastitis compared to cattle [38]; however, a recent study by Biswas et al [39] identified subclinical mastitis in 16% of the quarters of a yak herd. The significant impact of mastitis on milk quality and safety combined with the importance of milk and its products to yak herders [39] suggests that the benefits of testing for mastitis when there are issues may more than justify the high proportion of tests during which no problems are identified.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%