2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.geothermics.2020.101998
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of permeability anisotropy and layering on geothermal battery energy storage

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, none of these publications considered a single well injection/production scheme in porous formation for a geothermal energy storage system. In our previous study (Panja et al, 2021), it is shown that the heat recovery for a given cycle is not affected significantly by permeability anisotropy and layering of the storage medium. In this study, we investigate the effects of permeability heterogeneity on geothermal battery functionality.…”
Section: Parametersmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…However, none of these publications considered a single well injection/production scheme in porous formation for a geothermal energy storage system. In our previous study (Panja et al, 2021), it is shown that the heat recovery for a given cycle is not affected significantly by permeability anisotropy and layering of the storage medium. In this study, we investigate the effects of permeability heterogeneity on geothermal battery functionality.…”
Section: Parametersmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Directional properties of pore space, including the preferred shape, alignment and connectivity of pores, control preferred flow directions in porous media. This pore fabric is thus an important input parameter for aquifer and reservoir modelling, to understand sub-surface flow patterns, and to predict fluid paths (Ayan et al, 1994;Bear, 2013;Bear, Braester, & Menier, 1987;Huang, Tao, Li, Lyu, & Guo, 2017;Ijeje, Gan, & Cai, 2019;Panja, McLennan, & Green, 2021;Rasolofosaon & Zinszner, 2002;Sinan, Glover, & Lorinczi, 2020;Storesletten, 1998;Wang, Huang, Lu, Tang, & Li, 2019;Willems, Nick, Donselaar, Weltje, & Bruhn, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are defined as the anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility (AMS) of ferrofluid-impregnated samples, and may reflect depositional or tectonic fabrics (Pfleiderer and Kissel, 1994, Hailwood and Ding, 2000, Parés et al, 2016. As pore fabrics control fluid flow in porous media, their accurate description is important in many areas of geophysics and geology, including convective flow models, aquifer and reservoir characterization, geothermal energy and CO2 storage applications (Ayan et al, 1994, Huang et al, 2017, Ijeje et al, 2019, Panja et al, 2021, Sinan et al, 2020, Wang et al, 2014, Wang et al, 2019, Willems et al, 2017, Storesletten, 1998. Traditional pore characterization methods such as X-ray tomography face trade-offs between sample size and resolution, and generate large amounts of data that need to be processed (Cnudde andBoone, 2013, Landis andKeane, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%