2017
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00890
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Phosphorus and Cell Geometry on the Fractionation of Sulfur Isotopes by Several Species of Desulfovibrio during Microbial Sulfate Reduction

Abstract: We investigated the influence of organic substrates and phosphate concentration on the rates of dissimilatory microbial sulfate reduction and the 34S/32S isotopic fractionation produced by several Desulfovibrio species. Our experiments corroborate the previously reported species-specific correlation between sulfur isotope fractionation and cell-specific sulfate reduction rates. We also identify cell size as a key factor that contributes to the species-effect of this correlation. Phosphate limitation results in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
(192 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bioisotopic models have the potential to reveal details of the elusive mechanisms that control such isotopic fingerprints. Such models have been successfully applied to microbial sulfate reduction by demonstrating how the sulfur isotope fractionations of individual steps in the pathway combine to control the net fractionation (Wing & Halevy, 2014;Zaarur et al, 2017;Wenk et al, 2017).…”
Section: Isotopic Composition Of Methanementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bioisotopic models have the potential to reveal details of the elusive mechanisms that control such isotopic fingerprints. Such models have been successfully applied to microbial sulfate reduction by demonstrating how the sulfur isotope fractionations of individual steps in the pathway combine to control the net fractionation (Wing & Halevy, 2014;Zaarur et al, 2017;Wenk et al, 2017).…”
Section: Isotopic Composition Of Methanementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Right axis (green squares): Distribution of csSRR in laboratory cultures where also sulfur isotope fractionation factors were determined. Rates compiled for marine sediment are taken from D’Hondt et al (2002); Leloup et al (2009), and Beulig et al (2018), while pure culture data are a non-exhaustive compilation from Kaplan and Rittenberg (1964), Chambers et al (1975), Detmers et al (2001), Habicht et al (2005), Hoek et al (2006), Johnston et al (2007), Davidson et al (2009), Eckert et al (2011), Sim et al (2011a,b, 2012), Leavitt et al (2013), Pellerin et al (2015a), Antler et al (2017), Zaarur et al (2017) and Pellerin et al (2018b).…”
Section: Stable Sulfur Isotopesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Walvis Bay , D. inopinatus DSM 10,711 and Desulfobacca acetoxidans DSM 11109, which have been isolated from a narrow diversity of environments. While the first three strains were isolated from marine sediments off the coast of Svalbard (Norway), Walvis Bay (South Africa), and Venice (Italy), respectively, D. acetoxidans DSM 11,109 was isolated from a UASB sludge reactor [ 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 ]. In contrast to cluster 1, three out of the four poly-lysogens of the cluster 2 are classified as slow growing bacteria.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%