2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.03723.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of photoreactivating light intensity and incubation temperature on photoreactivation ofEscherichia colifollowing LP and MP UV disinfection

Abstract: Aims:  To investigate the effects of fluorescent light intensity, sunlight intensity and temperature on photoreactivation of Escherichia coli after low‐pressure (LP) and medium‐pressure (MP) ultraviolet (UV) disinfection. Methods and Results:  Two E. coli strains were irradiated with LP and MP UV lamps, and exposed to various fluorescent light (0–23 kLux) and sunlight intensities (1–80 kLux), and temperatures (4–50°C). Escherichia coli concentrations were enumerated at hourly intervals to determine photoreacti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
17
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
17
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The recovery of solar-inactivated E. coli through deoxyribonucleic acid repair mechanism after the stress is removed is a complex process with both biotic and abiotic components. Previous laboratory studies have demonstrated a logarithmic dark repair rate of 20% (or a 0.01% rate in the original count) for E. coli at a nearly constant temperature of 23uC 6 1uC after ultraviolet (UV) disinfection (Hu et al 2005;Quek and Hu 2008). Their dark repair case is comparable to the conditions of the present study, where E. coli would settle out of the sunlightpenetrated layer of water and eventually into the sediment.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The recovery of solar-inactivated E. coli through deoxyribonucleic acid repair mechanism after the stress is removed is a complex process with both biotic and abiotic components. Previous laboratory studies have demonstrated a logarithmic dark repair rate of 20% (or a 0.01% rate in the original count) for E. coli at a nearly constant temperature of 23uC 6 1uC after ultraviolet (UV) disinfection (Hu et al 2005;Quek and Hu 2008). Their dark repair case is comparable to the conditions of the present study, where E. coli would settle out of the sunlightpenetrated layer of water and eventually into the sediment.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…However, the strength of this local source was not anticipated to be large, because most of these resuspended E. coli had been inactivated by solar radiation during the day before they were settled into the sediment and overnight recovery in the submerged sediment was unlikely under typical, natural conditions. 5 In this sense, the observed high E. coli concentration in the submerged sediment (mean value 1585 CFU 100 mL −1 ) underneath the knee-deep water was more likely to be a result of early morning deposition of E. coli from deeper water than an original source. The local input of E. coli in the knee-deep water, even if significant to some extent, does not necessarily weaken the contribution of nighttime wave-transported E. coli onshore.…”
Section: ■ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The following equation proposed in previous studies (Quek and Hu ,b) was applied to obtain repair at each hour:%repair=NtN0NiN0…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%