2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2018.02.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of physical plasma etching treatment on optical and hydrophilic MgF2 thin film

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After MgPIII, Ta/TaN is more hydrophilic showing contact angles of 41.6 ± 1.0 • and 31.5 ± 1.1 • . The wettability is related to both the surface topography and surface chemistry, and a rougher surface shows a smaller water contact angle [68][69][70]. Plasma etching can enhance the hydrophilicity due to addition of oxygenated functional groups to the surface [69].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After MgPIII, Ta/TaN is more hydrophilic showing contact angles of 41.6 ± 1.0 • and 31.5 ± 1.1 • . The wettability is related to both the surface topography and surface chemistry, and a rougher surface shows a smaller water contact angle [68][69][70]. Plasma etching can enhance the hydrophilicity due to addition of oxygenated functional groups to the surface [69].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wettability is related to both the surface topography and surface chemistry, and a rougher surface shows a smaller water contact angle [68][69][70]. Plasma etching can enhance the hydrophilicity due to addition of oxygenated functional groups to the surface [69]. It also increases the surface roughness and surface energy and creates a hydrophilic surface compared to the Ta/TaN specimen.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, their mechanical properties may limit their use as hard coatings. MgF 2 [ 135 ] and CaF 2 [ 114,115 ] may still find application for protecting optical surfaces, but their hardness is dependent on the deposition technique.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, their mechanical properties may limit Boron nitride [ 99,112,113] Calcium fluoride [ 114,115] Gallium oxide [122][123][124][125][126][127] Potassium bromide [ 139] Polydimethyl siloxane [ 141] PDMS 1.42 at 700 nm 0.39-0.78 Soft -0.002 Hydrophobic Silicon [ 128] Silicon carbide [ 142,143] Yttrium oxide [ 147,148] Zinc selenide [ 128,150] Zinc sulfide [ 151,152] their use as hard coatings. MgF 2 [135] and CaF 2 [114,115] may still find application for protecting optical surfaces, but their hardness is dependent on the deposition technique.…”
Section: Fluoridesmentioning
confidence: 99%