1980
DOI: 10.2134/jeq1980.00472425000900010013x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Plant Maturity on the Sensitivity of Turfgrass Species to Ozone

Abstract: The increased prevalence of phytotoxic levels of oxidants during inversions in urban regions prompted an evaluation of the sensitivities of turf species to different doese of ozone at several stages of plant development. Warm and cool season turfgrass species and cultivars were exposed in fumigation chambers to various concentrations of ozone then scored for vegetative damage. The warm season entries ‘Meyer’ zoysiagrass (Zoysia japonica Steud.) and ‘Tufcote’ bermudagrass (Cynodon doctylon L., Pers.) exhibited … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1984
1984
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This example might well explain some of the variation in relative resistance reported in the literature and it suggests caution in making comparisons between species with different growth characteristics. Furthermore, as plants change in response to ozone with age and development (Blum & Heck, 1980 ;Richards, Mulchi & Hall, 1980 ;Cooley & Manning, 1987 ;Tenga, Marie & Ormrod, 1990 ;Reiling & Davison, 1992 b ;Lyons & Barnes, 1998), the choice of growth stage might bias the estimate of resistance.…”
Section: Relative Resistance -Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This example might well explain some of the variation in relative resistance reported in the literature and it suggests caution in making comparisons between species with different growth characteristics. Furthermore, as plants change in response to ozone with age and development (Blum & Heck, 1980 ;Richards, Mulchi & Hall, 1980 ;Cooley & Manning, 1987 ;Tenga, Marie & Ormrod, 1990 ;Reiling & Davison, 1992 b ;Lyons & Barnes, 1998), the choice of growth stage might bias the estimate of resistance.…”
Section: Relative Resistance -Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…acclimation ' -used herein to refer to any change in either plant morphology or physiology triggered by prior exposure to the pollutant which is directed toward a recovery in plant performance). Such knowledge is necessary to improve our understanding of the relative importance of the timing of O $ episodes in relation to the stage of plant development (Blum & Heck, 1980 ;Richards, Mulchi & Hall, 1980 ;Krupa & Manning, 1988 ;Lee, Tingey & Hogsett, 1988 ;Kasana, 1991 ;Younglove et al, 1994).…”
Section: mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effective protection of natural ecosystems generally considered more sensitive (Heck & Dunagainst ozone by means of air-quality guidelines ning, 1967;Hill, Heggestad & Linzon, 1970; Blum such as the UN-ECE critical levels (UN-ECE, & Heck, 1980;Richards, Mulchi & Hall, 1980;Bull, 1991;DavisonSt Barnes, 1992), depends Taylor, Ashmore & Bell, 1988;Kasana, 1991). on sound knowledge of the pollutant response of Because of this possible age effect, sensitivity from native species (Davison & Barnes, 1992; Reiling & seedling to seed production was tested to ascertain if Davison, 1992a).…”
Section: Introduction ^J^^ Literature Is Not Extensive Young Plantsmentioning
confidence: 99%