2006
DOI: 10.1109/jlt.2006.879218
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of polarization on pump-signal RIN transfer and cross-phase modulation in copumped Raman amplifiers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Raman pumps that have low walk-off with the signal mediate a cross-polarization penalty that was not detected in singlepolarized 10G OOK signal formats (which has a polarization insensitive receiver). A similar effect was noted in [35] and was attributed to a pump-signal cross-phase modulation. This impairment limits the number of spans that could employ forward Raman amplification and the pump wavelengths that would be used.…”
Section: E Other Impairmentssupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Raman pumps that have low walk-off with the signal mediate a cross-polarization penalty that was not detected in singlepolarized 10G OOK signal formats (which has a polarization insensitive receiver). A similar effect was noted in [35] and was attributed to a pump-signal cross-phase modulation. This impairment limits the number of spans that could employ forward Raman amplification and the pump wavelengths that would be used.…”
Section: E Other Impairmentssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…RIN may also transfer between pumps before transferring to a signal so that multiple pump processes have also been studied [32], [33]. Noise can transfer through phase (as opposed to just intensity) which has received additional consideration in the literature [34], including polarization effects [35], for phase-modulated signals. The last study was particularly relevant as it modeled the spectral and polarization properties of pump lasers as they are typically implemented which results in a larger RIN penalty than more simplistic models.…”
Section: Noise Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quantitative differences compared to the theoretical and numerical results described in the previous sections are mainly ascribed to the use in the experiments regarding the initial level influence of a non-zero walk-off fiber and to polarization issues. The unpolarized nature of the pump wave, as well as the influence of polarization mode dispersion of the fiber can indeed strongly affect the signal evolution [14,45]. In spite of its interest, such a study goes beyond the scope of the present article.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, the intensities of the Raman pump lights varied with time, and the variety of pump intensities could change the Raman gain and the intensity of the signal light, referred to as the RIN transfer [13]. The RIN transfer and the XPM were dependent on the group delay between the signal and the pump lights [17]. Generally, the Raman pump sources are broadband continuous wave lasers.…”
Section: Principlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…When we neglect the pump depletion, the coupled NLSE can be simplified to a simplified NLSE of the signal light. With the equation, we can analyze phenomena such as self-phase modulation (SPM), RIN transfer, and cross-phase modulation (XPM) from the pump lights to the signal lights [17]. However, pump depletion cannot always be neglected, and it will induce dominant errors in the system with high pump power and high Raman gain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%