2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.12.078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of porewater sulfide on methylmercury production and partitioning in sulfate-impacted lake sediments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
39
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
3
39
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Changes to the binding strength of the DOC in heavily S‐impacted mesocosm sediment are possible, as thiol groups on DOC are dominant binding sites for Hg (Skyllberg, ). The dual role of organic carbon and sulfur in driving both the production of MeHg and the transport of MeHg could be responsible for the substantially larger maximum increase in MeHg:DOC ratio relative to the increase in the THg:DOC ratio (an average 206% increase relative to a 63% increase, Figures c and d), as postulated by Bailey et al ().…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Changes to the binding strength of the DOC in heavily S‐impacted mesocosm sediment are possible, as thiol groups on DOC are dominant binding sites for Hg (Skyllberg, ). The dual role of organic carbon and sulfur in driving both the production of MeHg and the transport of MeHg could be responsible for the substantially larger maximum increase in MeHg:DOC ratio relative to the increase in the THg:DOC ratio (an average 206% increase relative to a 63% increase, Figures c and d), as postulated by Bailey et al ().…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In principle, the restricted bioavailability of Hg to methylating bacteria results in a maximum in MeHg production at intermediate concentrations of pore water sulfide. Consistent with previous research in sulfate‐impacted freshwater ecosystems (Gilmour et al, ; Gilmour, Krabbenhoft, et al, , Gilmour, Orem, et al, ; Bailey et al, ), MeHg production was most efficient at intermediate sulfide concentrations. In the control, where average sulfide was 69 μg S L −1 , MeHg averaged only 11% of THg in surface waters.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…, Bailey et al . ). However, a definitive threshold has not been established because of site‐specific conditions that contribute to the fate of HS − .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Additionally, the HS − concentration likely assists in increasing the %MeHg. Recent studies showed that concentrations of dissolved HS − above 10-30 μM inhibit MeHg production due to the formation of charged Hg-S species (Hammerschmidt et al 2008, Schartup et al 2014, Bailey et al 2017). However, a definitive threshold has not been established because of sitespecific conditions that contribute to the fate of HS − .…”
Section: Mercury Geochemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%