2022
DOI: 10.4093/dmj.2021.0059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Pre-Pregnancy Underweight Body Mass Index on Fetal Abdominal Circumference, Estimated Weight, and Pregnancy Outcomes in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

Abstract: This study aimed to determine the influence of pre-pregnancy body mass index on pregnancy outcomes in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), comparing underweight patients with GDM with normal weight patients with GDM. Maternal baseline characteristics, ultrasonographic results, and pregnancy and neonatal outcomes were reviewed in 946 women with GDM with singleton pregnancies. Underweight patients with GDM showed a benign course in most aspects during pregnancy, except for developing a higher risk of giving birt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 41 Moreover, recent data from our institute revealed that about 10% of GDM women are underweight (BMI < 18.5 kg/m 2 ), and these women have a rather significantly higher risk of SGA. 32 Meanwhile, our data also showed that, incidence-wise, obesity is more prevalent than GDM (13.03% vs. 10.20%). Together with the finding that obese women without GDM have higher risks for adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes than supervised GDM women and non-obese women, our study implicates that we need to develop systematic management protocols targeting maternal obesity to be included in current GDM education, instead of worrying too much about well-supervised non-obese diabetes patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 41 Moreover, recent data from our institute revealed that about 10% of GDM women are underweight (BMI < 18.5 kg/m 2 ), and these women have a rather significantly higher risk of SGA. 32 Meanwhile, our data also showed that, incidence-wise, obesity is more prevalent than GDM (13.03% vs. 10.20%). Together with the finding that obese women without GDM have higher risks for adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes than supervised GDM women and non-obese women, our study implicates that we need to develop systematic management protocols targeting maternal obesity to be included in current GDM education, instead of worrying too much about well-supervised non-obese diabetes patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“… 31 Also, according to another Korean research, in GDM women, gestational weight gain was less in the group with high pre-pregnancy BMI. 32 As such, obese women may gain less weigh during pregnancy. Of note, relative weight gain based on the women’s pre-pregnancy BMI is more important than absolute weight gain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the unique clinical, epidemiological, and pathophysiological features of lean DM, the current treatment guidelines for overweight/obese women with GDM may not be helpful (or even potentially harmful) to lean women with GDM. For example, while large-for-gestational-age neonates are considered to be the most common adverse outcome in women with GDM, lean women with GDM are five times more likely to have small-for-gestational-age (SGA) neonates than normal or overweight women with GDM ( 34 ). Intrauterine protein deficiency has been clearly established to contribute to low birth weight and other neonatal development issues, as has been confirmed by many studies in animals ( 35 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, it is of vital significance to explore the pregnancy outcomes of GDM women with different thyroid hormone sensitivity and pBMI levels, which may deepen our understanding of GDM pathogenesis and add further guides for individualized GDM management. For example, previous study has indicated that GDM patients with underweight BMI encountered lower risk of preeclampsia and macrosomia and required a relaxed maternal glycemic target [ 54 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%