2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.supflu.2012.12.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of pretreatment on supercritical CO2 extraction from Nannochloropsis oculata

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
60
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
4
60
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As an example, Lorenzen et al developed an industrial process including an on-line purification step with bentonite as adsorbent [15], while Crampon et al carried out the scaling up of an analytical SFE process evaluating the influence of the pressure, the sc-CO 2 /microalgal mass ratio and the particle size in the yield and extraction kinetics. Employing readily applicable operating conditions (50 MPa, 60 °C, 0.5 mm particle size and a CO 2 /biomass ratio lower than 30), they obtained extracts with similar composition to those achieved at analytical scale [20].…”
Section: Supercritical Fluid Extraction For Microalgal Lipid Extractionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As an example, Lorenzen et al developed an industrial process including an on-line purification step with bentonite as adsorbent [15], while Crampon et al carried out the scaling up of an analytical SFE process evaluating the influence of the pressure, the sc-CO 2 /microalgal mass ratio and the particle size in the yield and extraction kinetics. Employing readily applicable operating conditions (50 MPa, 60 °C, 0.5 mm particle size and a CO 2 /biomass ratio lower than 30), they obtained extracts with similar composition to those achieved at analytical scale [20].…”
Section: Supercritical Fluid Extraction For Microalgal Lipid Extractionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…As can be observed in Table 1, SFE for the recovery of lipids from microalgae requires high extraction pressures (higher than 30 MPa); the explanation proposed by Sovová et al deals with the high adsorption capacity of microalgae; under low pressures, microalgae bind to the fraction of the [20] extracted lipids, whereas an increase of pressure decreases its adsorption and, therefore, extraction rates only depend on the oil solubility in the sc-CO 2 [21]. In this work, a mathematical model is proposed for the study and simulation of the effect of particle size, CO 2 flow rate, temperature and pressure on the mass transfer resistance, adsorption capability and partition coefficient.…”
Section: Supercritical Fluid Extraction For Microalgal Lipid Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The operating variables influencing the performance of SCCO 2 extraction of microalgae lipids are pressure, temperature, and fluid flow rate. Crampon et al [44] used SCCO 2 method of extraction from N. oculata with air flow drying and freeze drying as pretreatment methods. The airflow drying at a temperature of 35°C was the most adequate pretreatment method for extracting 90% by weight of triglycerides without any phospholipids.…”
Section: Supercritical Co 2 Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oil extraction is known as a cost-determining step [6,7], partly because it requires harsh treatment for cell disruption for efficient lipid recovery. This pretreatment can be broadly categorized into two types: 1) mechanical disintegration such as expression/expeller press [8,9] and ultrasonication [10,11], and 2) chemical means such as hexane solvent [12], soxhlet [13,14], and supercritical fluid extraction [15,16]. However, each of these preexisting methods, though effective, has its own critical drawbacks of requiring massive energy consumption (mechanical disruption), long operating time (hexane solvent extraction), high amount of chemicals consumed and the associated safety issues (soxhlet extraction), and energy-intensive equipment (supercritical extraction).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%