2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2012.03.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of primary crystallisation conditions on the mechanical and interfacial properties of micronised budesonide for dry powder inhalation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These data highlight the subtle nature of surface interfacial free energy of the DPI formulation components, which, in turn, may affect the performance of the final drug product (33). Hence, it is essential to understand the relationship between material processing and its influence on the physicochemical properties to formulate DPI drug products with desired performance characteristics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data highlight the subtle nature of surface interfacial free energy of the DPI formulation components, which, in turn, may affect the performance of the final drug product (33). Hence, it is essential to understand the relationship between material processing and its influence on the physicochemical properties to formulate DPI drug products with desired performance characteristics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Micronized budesonide (Sterling S.r.l, Perugia, Italy) was used as received. The cohesive-adhesive balance (CAB) value for the sourced micronized budesonide was determined as 0.62 following a method described elsewhere (26), implying that the drug preferentially adhered to the lactose, with the interaction being 38% greater than the drug-drug interaction. Methanol and acetonitrile were of HPLC grade (Fisher Scientific, Loughborough, UK), and water was reverse osmosis purified.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Cyclohaler device (Teva Pharmaceuticals, The Netherlands) was used for aerosolising the formulations into a Next Generation Impactor (NGI, Copley Scientific, Nottingham, UK) equipped with a pre-separator. Air was drawn through the impactor at 90 l/min for 2.7 seconds (Kubavat et al, 2012) as controlled by a TPK critical flow controller (also from Copley Scientific). Two capsules were aerosolised into the impactor with plates coated with silicone oil and the pre-separator filled with 15 ml of mobile phase.…”
Section: In Vitro Assessment Of Formulation Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concentration of budesonide collected in the different parts of the impactor was assessed using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) following a method reported elsewhere (Kubavat et al, 2012). Briefly, the samples were dissolved in mobile phase consisting of 20% water, 35% acetonitrile and 45% methanol.…”
Section: High Performance Chromatography (Hplc) Assay Of Budesonidementioning
confidence: 99%