2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-020-04929-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of printing parameters on structures, mechanical properties and surface characterization of aluminium alloy manufactured using selective laser melting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results demonstrate that manipulations with 3D-printing orientation and relatively simple and commonly applied mechanical methods of surface treatment give wide range of opportunities for the fine tuning of mechanical response in structural elements of aerospace constructions to purposefully create high demanding parts by design. The variation in the mechanical response of SLM 3D-printed articles at different printing orientations has been widely reported elsewhere [11,12]. Even for nominally identical printing parameters, the variation of local thermal history takes place due to the difference in the cooling conditions depending on the geometry of the printed part, the position of a given volume of interest inside the piece, the design and position of support, and many other aspects.…”
Section: Tensile Test Of 3d-printed Rs-333 Alloy: the Influence Of Surface Qualitymentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results demonstrate that manipulations with 3D-printing orientation and relatively simple and commonly applied mechanical methods of surface treatment give wide range of opportunities for the fine tuning of mechanical response in structural elements of aerospace constructions to purposefully create high demanding parts by design. The variation in the mechanical response of SLM 3D-printed articles at different printing orientations has been widely reported elsewhere [11,12]. Even for nominally identical printing parameters, the variation of local thermal history takes place due to the difference in the cooling conditions depending on the geometry of the printed part, the position of a given volume of interest inside the piece, the design and position of support, and many other aspects.…”
Section: Tensile Test Of 3d-printed Rs-333 Alloy: the Influence Of Surface Qualitymentioning
confidence: 91%
“…These disparate factors interact in a complex manner and lead to the emergence of various hierarchical microstructures with specific characteristics, e.g., arrangement and size of grains, grain boundaries, pores, and reinforcing phase particles. Numerous studies have been reported of the correlation between the fabrication parameters (laser wavelength and power, scanning rate and path width and overlap, growth direction with respect to the sample shape, design of supports, and many others), on the one hand, and internal structure and mechanical and functional properties for many metallic materials [7][8][9][10], specifically for Al alloys [11][12][13], on the other. Elongated columnar crystallites and equiaxed grains appear to be the pre-dominant structural elements in 3Dprinted metals at the dimensional level of 10-300 µm [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The elongation was mainly due to the ductile nature of Aluminium which will be evident during the action of external loads [39]. Even though the presence of SiC particles will restrict the elongation movements, SC samples shows 27.1% higher elongating when compared to the AM samples.…”
Section: Tensile Testmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[8]-[29] Rectangular cross-section samples machined on all sides [3], [30]- [35] Flat cross-section samples cut out of a plate or thin-walled profile [36]- [39] Net shape rectangular cross-section samples that were sandblasted [40] Net shape cylindrical [6], [41]- [43] Mass-produced net shape rectangular samples [44] Understanding the influence of the sample cross-section size on the measured strength is crucial to be able to compare the values of strength reported using different sample geometries. In this article we complement our previous results from [5] with additional study of material microstructure and make a comparison with the results of [6] in order to gain a deeper understanding on how the measured strength and microstructure of SLM-produced AlSi10Mg are affected by the size of printed cross-section.…”
Section: Machined Cylindrical Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%