2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Prostatic Edema on 131Cs Permanent Prostate Seed Implants: A Dosimetric and Radiobiological Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another important factor is prostate edema [16][17][18][19][20] which is proportional to the number of needle insertion/manipulation and number of needle used. Waterman et al investigated extensively the effects of edema on dose distribution using 125 I and 103 Pd seeds, and suggested to incorporate these effects in dosimetric plans.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another important factor is prostate edema [16][17][18][19][20] which is proportional to the number of needle insertion/manipulation and number of needle used. Waterman et al investigated extensively the effects of edema on dose distribution using 125 I and 103 Pd seeds, and suggested to incorporate these effects in dosimetric plans.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16,17 Kehwar et al have suggested that the effect of edema must be accounted for when defining the seed positions, to avoid the possibility of poor dosimetric and radiobiologic results for 131 Cs seed implants. 18 Bucci et al reported that the amount of postimplant edema demon-strated a significant effect on the risk of urinary obstructive symptoms. 19 The range of edema has been nicely summarized in the report of the AAPM TG-137.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the needle introduction into the peripheral area is challenging puncturing prostate capsule away from central axis, increased needle obliquity angle, inadequacy/non rigidity in supporting of the prostate and single point proximalend actuation of a long slender needle (Nag et al, 2000). Another important factor is the swelling of the prostate during brachytherapy (Kehwar et al, 2011;Nath et al, 74 2009). Eapen et al (2004) discovered that the prostate trauma due to the needle insertion makes a significant contribution to the development of acute urogenital toxicity.…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, 131 Cs seeds have been implemented in many centers across USA, including our institution. (1)(2)(3) The design of 131 Cs seed is similar to that of 125 I and 103 Pd, but has a shorter half-life of 9.7 days, and slightly higher average photon energy than 125 I and 103 Pd. (4)(5)(6) The shorter half-life of 131 Cs can induce differences between planned and delivered doses due to prostatic edema, thus potentially impacting values of dosimetric and radiobiological quantities of interest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since 131 Cs is a relatively new radioactive source used for prostate permanent seed implants, a number of studies have been done to investigate the effect on edema of 131 Cs permanent seed implants. (2,3,(7)(8)(9)(10)(11) In a recent study, we derived prostate volume changes after prostate brachytherapy from its original volume using US and CT images acquired at day 0, day 14, and day 28 after implant, and found that the prostate edema resolves exponentially with postimplant time. (2) The exponential decay of prostatic edema induces a significant amount of change in dosimetric and radiobiological quantities in 131 Cs implants due to its short half-life of 9.7 days.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%