1926
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7348.1926.tb04295.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

INFLUENCE OF PROTOZOA ON THE PROCESS OF NITROGEN FIXATION BY AZOTOBACTER CHROOCOCCUM

Abstract: 1 The problem WM developed and the exprimemta were made by D. V. Bal end the interpmtstion of the d t i n is e aonfoint produot&~u. Mr Bal t a b thin opportanity to exprum hb ptitude to Sir John Rume.ll for having dlowed bim to work at thi~ He is elso indebtad to the Lead Addnbtmtion, cslntrsl FVovinca, India, end to IIbr F. J. Plymen and h IX. E. h t t for making tlte visit t o Ilofhmsted pcrSible.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
2

Year Published

1931
1931
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Predation has been associated with alteration in the rates of microbially mediated biogeochemical processes, including nitrogen fixation [16], nitrification [17], carbon fixation [6], the production of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) [18,19] and jet fuel degradation [20]. In some cases in which predators are grazing directly on the microorganisms responsible for the process in question, evidence of lower prey populations and higher community productivity suggests increases in the prey per-cell metabolic activity [16,17].…”
Section: Predation In Microbial Communitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Predation has been associated with alteration in the rates of microbially mediated biogeochemical processes, including nitrogen fixation [16], nitrification [17], carbon fixation [6], the production of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) [18,19] and jet fuel degradation [20]. In some cases in which predators are grazing directly on the microorganisms responsible for the process in question, evidence of lower prey populations and higher community productivity suggests increases in the prey per-cell metabolic activity [16,17].…”
Section: Predation In Microbial Communitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some cases in which predators are grazing directly on the microorganisms responsible for the process in question, evidence of lower prey populations and higher community productivity suggests increases in the prey per-cell metabolic activity [16,17]. However, it is unclear if this is a direct response to predation on the part of individual prey cells or an indirect result of lower prey population densities because of grazing pressure.…”
Section: Predation In Microbial Communitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, the ecosystem function that would be affected by grazing would be photosynthesis and N-fixation from the cyanobacteria. These possibilities have not been demonstrated experimentally with nematodes, but they have been shown for protozoa feeding on Azotobacter chroococcum (Nasir 1923;Cutler and Bal 1926) and Collembola feeding on arctic cyanobacterial mats (Birkemoe and Liengen 2000). In both cases, the experimenters found that N-fixation increased with intermediate levels of grazing from their microfaunal predator.…”
Section: What Microfauna Do In Soil Crust Ecosystemsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The theory put forward by Russell & Hutchinson has never been fully accepted. Laboratory experiments with pure cultures of bacteria with and without the additions of Protozoa have shown that the latter do not always depress the biochemical activity of the bacteria, but may in fact stimulate it under certain conditions (Nasir, 1923;Cutler & Bal, 1926;Cutler & Crump, 1929;Harvey & Greaves, 1941;Meiklejohn, 1930Meiklejohn, , 1932. Further critical work is needed to explain this most interesting phenomenon.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%